📖 Book 16 - Chapter 229
“Law Master’s Publication”  
‘Public Tranquility’  
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 87  
(..11..)  
(CHAP. VIII Ss. 141 TO 160)  
QUESTION BANK  
Q.1. What is unlawful assembly? When a person is said to be the member  
of Unlawful assembly?  
Q.2. Define ‘Unlawful assembly’, Distinguish it’s from rioting and affray.  
Q.3. Define ‘Unlawful Assembly’. Can a lawful assembly become  
unlawful?  
Q.4. Define Unlawful assembly, and distinguish between common object  
and common intention.  
Q.5. Explain in detail rioting as a specific offence.  
SHORT NOTES  
1.  
2.  
3.  
Riot  
Unlawful assembly  
Unlawful assembly and Royalty  
SYNOPSIS  
I]  
UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY  
A)  
B)  
C)  
D)  
Unlawful Assembly (S. 141)  
Being a member of Unlawful assembly (S. 142 and S. 143)  
Liability for Constructive Criminality (S.149)  
Other Cognate offences of ‘Unlawful Assembly ’  
II]  
RIOTING (Ss. 146, 148, 152-153)  
A)  
B)  
Ingredients of riot: -  
Distinction between ‘rioting’ (S.146) and ‘unlawful  
assembly’ (S.141)  
III] AFFRAY (Ss. 159-160)  
Chapter VIII, from Ss.141 to 160, deals with offences committed by a group  
“Law Master’s Publication”  
‘Public Tranquility’  
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 88  
of persons who disturb public peace (i.e., tranquility). These offences fall in  
between offences against the State and offences against the individual. They are as  
follows-  
1)  
2)  
3)  
4)  
Unlawful Assembly (Ss. 141,145,150,151,157 and 158)  
Rioting (S.146- to S. 148 and Ss.152 to 156)  
Promoting enmity between different classes (S. 153 A)  
Affray (Ss. 159 and 160).  
I]  
UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY:-  
Under this chapter, the mere assembly of persons is not punishable.  
However, where the public assembles in such a way as to cause terror in the  
people's minds and endanger public peace, the assembly is termed an unlawful  
assembly. S. 141 defines unlawful assembly, and S. 142 to S. 145, S. 150, S. 151,  
and S. 158 deal with the punishments to the persons constituting an unlawful  
assembly.  
A)  
Unlawful Assembly (S. 141): -  
An unlawful assembly is an assembly of five or more persons if their  
common object is: -  
1)  
to overawe by criminal force or by show of criminal force-  
i)  
the Central or State Government, or  
ii)  
the Parliament or Legislature of any State, or  
iii) any public servant in the lawful exercise of the power of such public  
servant-  
2)  
3)  
4)  
to resist the execution of any law or legal process,  
to commit any mischief or criminal trespass or other offences, or  
by means of criminal force or show of criminal force to any person.  
a) to take or obtain possession of any property or  
b) to deprive any person of –  
i) the enjoyment of the right of way or  
ii) the use of water, or  
iii)  
other  
incorporeal  
rights  
of  
which  
he  
is  
in  
possession or enjoyment or  
c)  
d)  
to enforce any right or supposed right or  
to compel any person -  
i)  
to do what he is not legally bound to do,  
to omit to do what he is legally entitled to do  
ii)  
An assembly which was not unlawful when assembled may become  
unlawful subsequently.  
Thus, an assembly of five or more persons with one or more of the above  
seven objects becomes unlawful.  
“Law Master’s Publication”  
‘Public Tranquility’  
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 89  
However, mere presence does not make a person a member of the unlawful  
assembly unless shown to have done something in furtherance of their common  
object. .  
In Peary Mohun Sivear’s Case1  
Facts:- There was a long-standing dispute between the accused and some  
other persons relating to the ownership of the piece of land. One day, the accused  
went to sow the land with indigo, accompanied by a group of men armed with  
sticks, who kept off the men belonging to the other group by brandishing their  
sticks while the land was being sowed.  
Held: - By doing so, they have constituted unlawful assembly.  
B)  
Being a Member of Unlawful Assembly (S. 142 and S. 143): -  
S.142 defines a member of unlawful assembly as  
Whoever, being aware  
i) Joins that  
assembly, or  
ii) Continues in  
it,  
is said to be a  
of facts which render  
any assembly an  
intentionally  
member of an  
unlawful assembly”.  
unlawful assembly,  
S.143 provides the punishment for being a member of an unlawful assembly.  
Punishment - imprisonment up to six months or fine, or both.  
[Note- Whenever the sentence “imprisonment up to …..years” is mentioned, it is to be  
taken as “imprisonment which may extend to ……years”]  
C)  
Liability for Constructive Criminality (S.149): -  
S.149 provides the constructive liability of one member of an unlawful  
assembly for the act done by another member of the assembly in the prosecution  
of a common object-  
It provides that -  
If any member of an unlawful assembly commits an offence-  
i)  
in the prosecution of the common object of that assembly or  
such (offences) as the members of that assembly knew to be likely to  
be committed in prosecution of that object-  
ii)  
- every person who, at the time of committing that offence, is a member of the  
same assembly and is guilty of that offence.  
In Fatnay’s Case2  
Facts:- A body of heavily armed men set out to take a woman back by  
force. Consequently, one member of the party committed the murder of men from  
1
(1883) 9 Cal 639.  
2
1942 Lah. 89  
   
“Law Master’s Publication”  
‘Public Tranquility’  
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 90  
the opposite party.  
Court Held: - that the members of an unlawful assembly must be taken to  
have known that someone was likely to be killed. Therefore, all the party members  
were held constructively guilty of murder..  
The distinction between ‘in furtherance of common intention’ under  
S.34 and ‘in the prosecution of common object’ under S.149.  
( Discussed earlier in the topic of ‘joint offenders’ )  
D)  
Other Cognate offences of ‘Unlawful Assembly’:-  
1)  
Joining an unlawful assembly armed with a deadly weapon  
(Punishment- with imprisonment up to 2 years or with fine or with  
both) (S. 144)  
2)  
Joining or continuing in an unlawful assembly, knowing it has been  
commanded to disperse (Punishment- imprisonment up to two  
years, or with fine or with both) (S. 145)  
3)  
4)  
Hiring of a person to join unlawful assemble (S. 150).  
Harbouring person hired for an unlawful assembly. Punishment-  
Imprisonment up to 6 months, or with a fine or with both(S. 157).  
5)  
Being hired to take part in an unlawful assembly. Punishment  
-
imprisonment up to 6 months, or a fine or both (S. 158).  
II]  
RIOTING (Ss. 146, 148, 152-153):-  
S. 146 defines the offence of rioting. It is defined as follows-  
When force or violence is used by  
i)  
an unlawful assembly, or  
by any member  
the common object of such assembly,  
- Every member of such assembly is guilty of the offence of rioting”.  
The punishment prescribed is imprisonment for up to two years, a fine, or  
ii)  
thereof,  
in  
the  
prosecution  
of  
both (S.147). But if the offender is armed with deadly weapons, imprisonment for  
up to three years or fine, or both (S.148).  
In short, Unlawful assembly + force = Riot.  
A)  
Ingredients of Riot: -  
1)  
2)  
3)  
the use of force or violence,  
by an unlawful assembly (or by any member thereof)  
in the prosecution of the common object of such assembly.  
B) Distinction between ‘Rioting(S.146) and ‘Unlawful Assembly’  
(S.141):-  
A riotis an unlawful assembly in a particular state of activity in which the  
use of force or violence accompanies activity. Thus, the use of force distinguishes  
rioting from unlawful assembly. In other words, unlawful assembly is a genus of  
“Law Master’s Publication”  
‘Public Tranquility’  
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 91  
which rioting is a species.  
In Raghunath Rai’s Case3  
Facts: - In this case, Several Hindus (More than five) acting in concert  
forcibly removed two cows and an ox from the possession of a Mohammedan  
person. They did this to prevent the killing of cows.  
Held: - Accused were held guilty of rioting.  
III] AFFRAY (Ss. 159-160):-  
Public peace may also be disturbed by fighting in a public place. When-  
1) two or more persons,  
2) by fighting in a public place,  
3) disturb the public peace.  
They commit an affray (S. 159).  
It is punishable by imprisonment for up to one month, a fine of up to Rs.100, or  
both (S 160).  
In Jagannath Sah’s Case4.  
Facts: Two brothers were quarrelling and abusing each other on a public  
road, which resulted in a large crowd gathering and temporarily suspending traffic.  
Held: - that, as no actual fight took place, no affray was committed.  
*****  
3
1892 15 ALL 22.  
4
(1937) O.W.N. 37  
   
Purchased by: Guest