“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Hurt’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale
107
iii) Infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt (S.319).
The pain must be caused by the body. Pain caused to the mind is not relevant here.
Pain caused must be the direct result of the act. However, the infirmity may be caused
indirectly. Infirmity means the inability of an organ to perform its normal functions,
temporarily or permanently. S. 319 does not lay down any requirement of a guilty mind to
constitute hurt; therefore, taking blood for blood grouping, forceful medical examination
of an accused in a rape case, or performing an operation on the patient may come under the
definition of hurt.
However, S. 321 Provides that hurt must have been caused ‘voluntarily’ & ‘not
accidentally’ to punish the accused. S. 321 lays down that a person voluntarily causes hurt
if he does any act - a)
with the intention of thereby causing hurt to any person or
b) with the knowledge that he is likely, thereby, to cause hurt.
Punishment:-
Imprisonment up to one year or a fine up to Rs.1000 or both (S. 323).
Where there is no intention of causing hurt or no knowledge that the death is likely
to be caused by the harm inflicted and death is caused, the accused would be guilty of
causing hurt only and not of murder if the injury caused was not serious.
In Abani K. Debnath V/s State of Tripura1 (AIR 2006 SC 518)
Facts: The accused caused injuries to the deceased with a bamboo stick. The
opinion
of the doctor was that all the injuries were simple injuries.
Held: - Accused, convicted for causing ‘simple hurt’.
B)
Grievous Hurt (Ss. 320, 322, 325):-
The following kinds of hurts are designed as grievous:-
1) Emasculation- means depriving a man of masculine vigour.
2) Permanent privation of the sight of any eye.
1 In Bysagoo Noshyo
Facts: - A on a grave and sudden provocation gave B a stick blow on the abdomen, B had an enlarged spleen which
got punctured by the blow and B died in consequence.
Held: - That the death caused without intention or knowledge is not applicable. Therefore as A wanted to cause hurt,
he was punished for the same.
In Sayed A. Ahmed V/s. State of Maharashtra (2008 All MR 1082)
Facts :- Injuries were caused by barbers razor. Injured Should be established to be suffering bodily pain during phase
of 20 days or unable to follow his ordinary pursuit. No evidence was brought to show that injured suffered any of the
above injury.
Held :- The offence of simple hurt and not grievous has taken place.