54
“Law Master’s” Publication
“Prospectus”
Prof. S.D. Bhosale
Held- That the prospectus contains a misrepresentation of fact, and, therefore, the
plaintiff can rescind the contract.
However, the right of the recession of contract is not available to the shareholder if-
(i) he does not bring an action within a reasonable time.
(ii) winding up of a company has already commenced.
(iii) he waives his right of recession.
2)
a)
Claim for damages and compensation:-
Damages for Deceit (i.e., fraud):-
Deceit (i.e., fraud) is a tort that attracts damages liability. When the prospectus
contains statements that are fraudulent, the shareholder misled by those statements may
bring an action for the tort of deceit and claim damages from the company.
However, the misstatement in the prospectus should have been made dishonestly,
with an intention to deceive. Thus, if it is found that the statement is not made with an
intention to deceive, no liability under tort attracts; this is held in very famous English
cases, i.e.
Facts—Tramway Company issued a prospectus containing a statement that the
company had been authorised to run tramways with steam power. In those days, tramways
were run by horses. However, the Board of Directors refused the sanction subsequently,
but the Board of Directors believed that getting such permission would be a matter of time.
The directors, therefore, made such a statement under bonafide belief.
Issue- whether the statement was a misstatement to attract liability for fraud.
Held-No; the statement was bonafide. Therefore, directors were not liable for deceit.
However, the decision exposed the inadequacy of the ‘action for deceit’; therefore,
in India, a more comprehensive provision is made in S. 62 of the Indian Companies Act.
The section states that the investor is entitled to bring a suit for compensation for
any loss he sustained due to any untrue statement in the prospectus. A statement is deemed
untrue if it is false in the form and context in which it is made.
Such compensation can be recovered from the directors, promoters or the persons
who have authorised the issue of the prospectus.
However, the director or promoter may defend the suit by showing that he has
withdrawn his consent to be a director, that a prospectus was issued without his knowledge
or consent, and that he immediately published notice thereof.
b)
Compensation under S. 75 of the Contract Act:-
According to S. 75, a person who rightfully rescinds the contract is entitled to
compensation for any damage he has sustained due to the non-fulfilment of the contract.
2 (1889) 14 AC 337