(..13 ..)
(Ss. 425 to 520)
QUESTION BANK
Q.1 Discuss the Winding up of a company and the power of the liquidator; under what circumstances does a Tribunal order to wind up a company?
Q. 2 What are the different kinds or modes of winding up of a company.
Q. 3. Define winding up. Explain the consequences of winding up. Elaborate the role of the Tribunal and liquidator in winding up.
Q. 4. What is the scope and importance of the inability to pay debts and just and equitable causes as grounds for compulsory winding up?
SHORT NOTES
1) Winding up
2) Dissolution
3) Powers of Liquidator
a) Special Resolution
b) Sovereignty and Integrity of India
c) Fraudulent or Unlawful Conduct:
d) Default in Filing Financial Records:
e) Just and Equitable Grounds:
Judicial Application of "Just and Equitable" Grounds:
(i) The Company:
(ii) Contributories:
(iii) Joint Petition:
(iv) The Registrar of Companies (ROC):
(v) Central or State Government:
(vi) Persons Authorized by the Government:
Role of the ROC:
i) Collective Benefit (Section 278):
ii) Statutory Stay of Suits (Section 279):
iii) Appointment of Liquidator (Section 275):
iv) Settlement of Contributories and Rectification (Section 285):
v) Custody of Corporate Assets (Section 283):
----------------
As defined by Professor L.C.B. Gower:
"Winding up is the process whereby the life of the company is ended and its property is administered for the benefit of its creditors and members. A liquidator is appointed, and he takes over the control of the company, collects its assets, pays its debts, and finally distributes any surplus among the members in accordance with their rights."
Winding up is the formal legal process by which a corporate entity's life is brought to an end. However, a company’s corporate existence and legal personality do not immediately terminate at the commencement of winding up. The legal entity continues to exist throughout the liquidation process until it is formally dissolved.
Therefore, winding up always precedes dissolution. Winding up is the administrative process of settling accounts, whereas dissolution is the final judicial act that completely extinguishes the legal life of the company.
Following the enforcement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, a company may be wound up under the Companies Act, 2013, via:
Winding Up by the Tribunal (Compulsory Winding Up) under Chapter XX (Sections 271 to 303).
(Note: Voluntary winding up provisions previously detailed in the Companies Act have been omitted and transferred entirely to Section 59 of the IBC, 2016).
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) may, at its absolute discretion, order the compulsory winding up of a company under the following specific circumstances:
a) Special Resolution: If the company has passed a Special Resolution resolving that it be wound up by the Tribunal. The Tribunal, however, is not bound to act on this resolution and retains the discretion to refuse the order if it finds winding up unnecessary or contrary to public interest.
b) Sovereignty and Integrity of India: If the company has acted against the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency, or morality.
c) Fraudulent or Unlawful Conduct: If, upon an application by the Registrar or any person authorized by the Central Government, the Tribunal forms the opinion that:
i. The affairs of the company are being conducted in a fraudulent manner;
ii. The company was formed for a fraudulent or unlawful purpose; or
iii. The persons involved in its formation or management are guilty of fraud, misfeasance, or serious misconduct, making winding up the most appropriate remedy.
d) Default in Filing Financial Records: If the company has defaulted in filing its financial statements or annual returns with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for the immediately preceding five consecutive financial years.
e) Just and Equitable Grounds: This functions as a residuary clause giving wide discretionary powers to the Tribunal.
Judicial Application of "Just and Equitable" Grounds:
The Tribunal will generally grant a winding-up order under this head in cases involving:
Deadlock in Management: Complete paralysis in corporate administration (e.g., Yenidje Tobacco Co. Ltd. [1916] 2 Ch 426).
Loss of Substratum: Where the main commercial object for which the company was incorporated has become entirely impossible to achieve.
Bubble Company: Where the company is a mere sham, established purely to execute a fraud.
Oppression of Minority: Where the majority shareholders systematically exploit and oppress the minority, and winding up is the only effective escape.
A petition for compulsory winding up may be presented before the NCLT by any of the following entities: └───────────┘
(i) The Company: The company can petition the NCLT only after passing a Special Resolution at a General Meeting. The petition must be accompanied by a sworn, up-to-date Statement of Affairs.
(ii) Contributories: A "contributory" refers to any person liable to contribute to the assets of the company in the event of its winding up, including holders of fully paid-up shares. A contributory can file a petition even if the company has no assets or no surplus for distribution.
Statutory Proviso: A contributory cannot file a petition unless the shares were originally allotted to them, or have been registered in their name for at least six months out of the eighteen months immediately preceding the commencement of the winding up, or have devolved upon them through the death of a former holder.
(iii) Joint Petition: Any or all of the above-mentioned parties (the company and contributories) can file a petition jointly.
(iv) The Registrar of Companies (ROC): The Registrar can present a petition on any ground under Section 271 except the Special Resolution ground.
Statutory Proviso: The ROC must give the company a prior opportunity to be heard and must obtain the previous sanction of the Central Government.
(v) Central or State Government: If the petition is based on the company acting against the sovereignty, integrity, or security of India.
(vi) Persons Authorized by the Government: Any individual explicitly authorized by the Central Government via a legal notification.
Role of the ROC: A copy of every winding up petition filed by other parties must also be served onto the Registrar. The Registrar is statutorily required to submit their written views to the Tribunal within 60 days of receiving the copy.
i) Collective Benefit (Section 278): A winding up order operates in favor of all creditors and contributories uniformly, as if it had been made on a joint petition filed by them.
ii) Statutory Stay of Suits (Section 279): Once a winding up order is passed or a provisional liquidator is appointed, no suit or other legal proceeding can be commenced, and no pending suit can be proceeded with by or against the company, except with the explicit leave of the Tribunal and subject to its terms. This stay does not affect proceedings pending before the Supreme Court of India or a High Court.
iii) Appointment of Liquidator (Section 275): The NCLT appoints an Official Liquidator or a Provisional Liquidator at the time of passing the order to take control of the winding up process.
iv) Settlement of Contributories and Rectification (Section 285): The NCLT is empowered to settle the official list of contributories, rectify the register of members where necessary, and direct that the company’s assets be applied to discharge its outstanding liabilities.
v) Custody of Corporate Assets (Section 283): The Company Liquidator takes custody and physical possession of all property, books of account, tangible effects, and actionable claims to which the company is or appears to be entitled.
In summary or expedited liquidation setups, the Official Liquidator is required to act swiftly, targeting the disposal of all movable and immovable corporate assets within 60 days of their appointment.
The Official Liquidator must, within 30 days of their appointment, call upon the creditors of the company to formally prove their debts and submit their claims within the prescribed timeline.
When the affairs of the company are completely wound up and its assets are fully deployed, the Liquidator applies to the NCLT for dissolution. If satisfied that it is just and reasonable, the Tribunal will issue an order declaring the company dissolved from the date of the order, thereby completely extinguishing its corporate existence. A copy of this order must be forwarded to the ROC within 30 days.
----------------
For winding up proceedings under the Act, the NCLT selects and appoints a Provisional Liquidator or a Company Liquidator from a dynamic panel maintained by the Central Government.
Legal Note: Following amendments harmonized with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, this panel consists of Insolvency Professionals (IPs) registered with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). These professionals include qualified Chartered Accountants, Advocates, Company Secretaries, and Cost Accountants with specialized experience in corporate matters.
Under Section 359, the Central Government may appoint as many official, joint, deputy, or assistant official liquidators as necessary to carry out these administrative functions.
If a provisional liquidator is appointed prior to a final winding up order, the Tribunal can choose to limit or restrict their operational powers. Unless explicitly restricted by the NCLT's order, a provisional liquidator possesses the same extensive statutory powers as a full Company Liquidator.
The specific terms, conditions, and fee structure payable to the liquidator are specified directly by the NCLT. This is determined based on the size of the company, the complexity of the liquidation task, the assets involved, and the professional qualifications of the liquidator.
Upon appointment, a provisional or permanent liquidator must file a formal declaration with the NCLT within seven days. This declaration must confirm under oath that they have no conflict of interest or lack of independence regarding the assignment. This obligation to maintain transparency continues throughout their tenure.
The NCLT can remove a liquidator for cause, recording its reasons in writing. Valid statutory grounds for removal include:
Subject to the overall supervision and control of the NCLT, the Company Liquidator has wide administrative powers to wind up corporate affairs smoothly:
To ensure accountability, the liquidator's wide powers are subject to three layers of institutional control:
a. Control by the Tribunal: The liquidator is an officer of the court and must exercise all powers under the direct supervision, control, and review of the NCLT.
b. Resolutions of Creditors and Contributories: The liquidator must consider directions given via resolutions passed at meetings of creditors or contributories, or by the appointed Committee of Inspection. Directions from creditors or contributories override conflicting decisions made by the liquidator.
c. Control by the Central Government: Under Section 292, the Central Government takes active cognizance of the conduct of liquidators. If a liquidator fails to perform their duties or address investor complaints, the Government can conduct an inquiry and take appropriate administrative action.
Right of Appeal: Any person aggrieved by an act, decision, or distribution made by the liquidator has the legal right to apply to the NCLT. The Tribunal may confirm, reverse, or modify the liquidator's decision and pass any order it deems equitable.
*****