74
“Law Master’s” Publication
“Pre-emption”
Prof. S.D. Bhosale
when a person gets the information, he is so startled that he jumps from his seat. There
must not be any loss of time between receiving the news and making the demand.
Witnesses are not necessary for the first demand.
The right of preemption is considered a very weak right. Therefore, any procedural
formality or delay defeats this right. In Ali Muhammand v Taj Muhammad, the Court
considered a delay of twelve hours to be too long. Similarly, if a person, upon receiving the news
of the sale of the property from his wife, entered his house, took money from his pocket, went to
the property, and then made a demand, it was considered too late1.
(ii) Second demand:-
It is also called Talab-e-Ishhat. With the least practicable delay, the pre-emptor must make
a second demand either personally or through an agent. Such demand must be made-
(1) before two witnesses, (2) either before the seller, purchaser, or on the premises, and (3)
the pre-emptor must refer to his first demand. Thus, the preemptor may say, “Such a person
has bought such a house of which I am the pre-emptor. I have already claimed my privilege
of preemption, and now I again claim it; be you witness thereof”’.
(iii) Third demand:-
The third demand is taking legal action. In fact, the third demand is not a demand
as such, and, in many cases, it is not necessary if the pre-emption claim is accepted in
earlier demands. Only when his earlier demand is not conceded does the pre-emptor
enforce his right by bringing a suit. It is called talab-e-tamlik in Arabic.
The suit for preemption must be brought within one year of registering the
instrument of sale. The preemptor must claim the whole property sold, not part of it.
VIII. Right of preemption when lost:-
The right of preemption is lost in the following circumstances-
(1) Acquiescence or waiver:-
Pre-emptor loses the right if he expressly or impliedly waives the right or omits to
assert his right immediately.
(2) Death of pre-emptor:-
The death of the pre-emptor loses the right of preemption.
(3) Release for consideration:-
The right is lost if the release for consideration is paid to the pre-emptor.
IX. Constitutional validity of the preemption:-
The Bombay, Allahabad and Patna High Courts had earlier upheld the constitutional
validity of all three forms of preemption. However, in Razzaque Sajan Bgwan v. Ibrahim
1 Jarfan Khan v. Jabbar Mia ILR (10) Cal. 383 (1884)