91
“Law Master’s” Publication
“Hindu Religious Endowment”
Prof. S.D. Bhosale
Shebait may raise money by simple loans or on some security; he may, if necessary,
sell some of the properties. However, he has to use the power of alienation in exceptional
circumstances.
***
2. Mahant-
Mahant is the manager of Math's property. He is the head of Math.
Math is the place where (i) persons of a particular religious community, or (ii)
followers thereof, reside, and (iii) it is a place where sanaysees reside or where religious
discourses and preaching are given. Properties are given in the math vest in the Mahant.
The main object of math is the propagation of religious beliefs.
Normally, Mahant is a Sanyasi or Bramhachari. However, there are some exceptions
also. A female can be Mahant. However, she cannot perform spiritual and religious rituals.
a) Position of Mahant-
Mahant acts in two ways: (i) as the spiritual head of Math and (ii) as a manager of
Math's property. He is the head of the institution. As a spiritual head, he performs religious
acts and worships idols. In this sense, he acts as a Shebait. As a manager, all Math
properties vest in him. He acts as a trustee of Math’s properties.
b) Proprietary rights of Mahant-
As discussed already, all Math properties vest him as a manager. In legal parlance,
he has Math’s estate for life to be used for Math’s purposes. In this sense, he has limited
interest in Math’s property. However, he has an absolute proprietary right to the income
derived from the offerings of his followers. He can use and retain the usufruct so long as
he remains Mahant and uses it for the objects of the endowment. However, he cannot spend
the property for immoral or personal purposes.
Thus, in conclusion, we may say that the Mahant is only the manager and guardian
of the idol and the institution of Math.
c) Devolution of property-
Generally, the property of Math and the office of Mahant devolve in accordance
with the rules of devolution laid down by the founder of the endowment. Without such
rules, it devolves according to the usage of that math. Even the Mahant can nominate his
successor if usage is prescribed.
The Supreme Court held that, generally, the Mahant has the right to nominate his successor
in his lifetime or by will. If the Mahant fails to use his right, an election is usually made
from the disciples; in the absence of disciples, anyone of his spiritual kindred like
3 AIR 1954 SC 606