(..19..)

OFFENCES AGAINST PROPERTY

QUESTION BANK

Q. 1    Explain the ingredient of offence of cheating

Q. 2    In all Robbery, there is either theft or exotic elucidates. Distinguish     between

Robbery and Dacoity

Q.3     Define & explain ‘Robbery’ and distinguish it from ‘Dacoity’

Q.4    Define and explain ‘cheating’

Q.5    Define and explain ‘Theft’

Q.6    What is extortion? Distinguish it from robbery.

SHORT NOTES

1. Cheating by personation.

1. Robbery & Dacoity

1. Theft and extortion

1. Criminal misappropriation and criminal branch of trust.

1. Mischief

1. Criminal breach of Trust.

1. Cheating.

INTRODUCTION:-

Chapter XVII is the second-longest chapter in the BNS, 2023. It consists of sections 303 to 377.

Offences against property can be divided into three groups, viz. -

A) Offences dealing with deprivation of property (Ss. 303 to 335)

B) Offences dealing with damage to property (Ss. 336 to 346)

C) Offences in relation to violation of rights to property in order

to commit some other offences (Ss. 347 to 377)

A) Offences Dealing with Deprivation of Property (Ss. 378 to 424):-

1) Theft (S. 303-309)

2) Extortion (S. 310-312)

3) Robbery and Dacoity (S. 313-320)

4) Criminal misappropriation of property (S. 321-322)

5) Criminal breach of trust (S. 323-326)

6) Receiving stolen property (S. 327-330)

7) Cheating (S. 331-334)

8) Dishonest Misappropriation of lost property (S. 335)

B) Offences Dealing with Damage to Property (Ss. 226 to 246)

1) Mischief (S. 336-345)

2) Criminal Trespass causing damage (S. 346)

C) Offences in Relation to Violation of Rights to Property in order to Commit

some other Offences (Ss. 347 to 377)

1) Criminal Trespass. (S. 347-350)

2) House Trespass (S. 351-359)

3) Lurking House Trespass/ Housebreaking. (S. 360-363)

     4) Dishonest of criminal intention in trespass (S. 364-368)

     5) Offences connected with possession, concealment, fraudulent dealing in property (S. 369 -377).

    It shows that the structure of BNS is very similar to that of IPC, so for offences relating to property are concerned. There are only renumbering of sections.

1) THEFT (Ss. 303 to 335):-

Synopsis

I. Definition:-

II. Explanations:-    

Punishment: -

III. Ingredients:-

1) Dishonest Intention:-

2) Movable Property:-

3) Out of the Possession of any Person:-

4) Without the Consent of that Person:-

5) Moves that Property:-

IV. Aggravated forms of theft (Ss. 380 to 382):-

1. Snatching (S. 304):

2. Theft in a Dwelling (S. 305):

3. Theft by a Clerk or Servant (S. 306):

4. Theft with preparation for harm (S. 307):

I. Definition:-

Whoever-

i) Intending to take dishonestly,

ii) Any movable property,

iii) Out of the possession of any person

iv) Without that person’s consent,

v) Moves that property in order to such taking,

- is said to commit theft (S.303)

II. Explanations:-

    Five explanations are provided for the definition of theft.

Explanation 1: - A thing so long as it is attached to the earth, not being moveable property, is not the subject of theft; but it becomes capable of being the subject of theft as soon as it is severed from the earth.

Explanation 2: A move effected by the same act that affects the severance may be theft.

Explanation 3: - A person is said to cause a thing to move by removing an obstacle that prevented it from moving or by separating it from any other thing as well as by actually moving it.

Explanation 4: - A person who by any means causes an animal to move is said to move that animal and to move everything which, in consequence of the motion so caused, is moved by that animal.

Explanation 5: - The consent mentioned in the definition may be expressed or implied and may be given either by the person in possession or by any person having for that purpose authority, either express or implied.

Illustrations

a) A cut down a tree on Z’s ground with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent. Here, as soon as A has severed the tree in order to do such taking, he has committed theft.

b) A puts bait for dogs in his pocket and thus induces Z’s dog to follow it. Here, if A’s intention is dishonest to take the dog out of Z’s possession without Z’s consent, A has committed theft as soon as Z’s dog has begun to follow A.

c) A meets a bullock carrying a box of treasure. He drives the bullock in a

certain direction in order that he may dishonestly take the treasure. As soon as the bullock begins to move, A has committed theft of the treasure.

d) A, being Z’s servant and entrusted by Z with the care of Z’s plate, dishonestly runs away with the plate without Z’s consent. A has committed theft. [All the illustrations provided by the section are given in a footnote for reference]

Punishment: - For theft, for the first conviction, the punishment is up to 3 years or a fine or both. However, in case of a second or subsequent conviction of any person, punishment is rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to five years and a fine. Provided that in case of theft where the value of the stolen property is less than five thousand rupees, and a person is convicted for the first time, upon return of the value of the property or restoration of the stolen property, he shall be punished with community service.

    Thus, the community service is a new kind of punishment introduced for theft.

Punishment for being a member of theft or robbery (S. 313)-

Whoever belongs to any gang of persons associated in habitually committing theft or robbery, and not being a gang of dacoits, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment up to seven years and a fine.

III. Ingredients: -

1) Dishonest Intention:-

The intention is the gist of the offence. Merely taking will not amount to the offence of theft unless the intention with which it is taken is ‘dishonest’. S.24 of the Code defines ‘dishonesty’ as doing anything with the intention of causing Wrongful Gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person. S. 23 of the Code defines ‘Wrongful Gain’ is the gain by unlawful means of the property to which the person gaining is not legally entitled. ‘Wrongful Loss’ is the loss by unlawful means of property to which the person losing it is legally entitled. Both ‘Wrongful Gain’ and ‘wrongful loss’ need not be caused at a time; either of these two is sufficient to constitute an offence of theft. If there is no intention of taking ‘dishonesty’, there is no theft. A bonafide act does not amount to theft. (See Illustration P)

Even one can steal his own property if he takes it dishonestly from another (See Illustration (j). A person will also act dishonestly even though he temporarily dispossesses another of his property, intending to return it later. (See Illustrations (a) and (l)).

2) Movable Property: -

The subject of the theft is movable property, i.e., corporeal property of every description except the land and things attached to the earth or permanently fixed to anything which is attached to the earth or permanently fixed to anything which is attached to the earth (Explanation I).

Things attached to the earth may become movable property as soon as they are severed from the earth, and this act of severance itself constitutes theft (Illustration (a))

‘Electricity’ is not ‘movable property’. However, by legal fiction under S.39 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, it is treated as the subject matter of theft.

3) Out of the Possession of any Person: -

Theft is an offence against ‘possession’ and not against ‘title’. Therefore, to constitute an offence of theft, removing the property out of the possession of somebody without his consent is necessary (Illustration (f))

Thus, there can be no theft of property that belongs to anyone.

Even though the person from whose possession the property is taken may or may not be its owner, he may be in possession of it, and he may not be its owner; it does not matter whether his possession is rightful or wrongful [See Illustration (j) and (k)]

4) Without the Consent of that Person: -

The stolen property must be removed without the express or implied consent of the person in possession. It is not necessary that the person giving consent must be the owner; he may have physical control over it under an express or implied authority of the owner [See Illustration (m) and (n)]

5) Moves that Property:-

Dishonestly moving the property out of the person's possession without that person’s consent constitutes theft. ‘Dishonest Moving’ is sufficient to constitute theft. It is not necessary that the thing moved should be carried away or carried off [See Explanations 3 and 4 and Illustrations (b) and (c)]

Moreover, taking may not be of a permanent nature; in other words, temporarily dispossessing another of property constitutes the offence of theft.

IV. Aggravated forms of theft (Ss. 380 to 382):-

The following are the aggravated forms of theft to which severe punishment is provided.

1. Snatching (S. 304): This new offence involves suddenly and forcibly taking movable property from a person. The punishment is imprisonment up to three years and a fine.

2. Theft in a Dwelling (S. 305): This covers theft committed within a house or any place used for human dwelling or property custody. It carries a punishment of up to seven years in prison and a fine.

3. Theft by a Clerk or Servant (S. 306): This section specifically deals with a clerk or servant who commits theft of their employer's property. The punishment is imprisonment up to seven years and a fine.

4. Theft with preparation for harm (S. 307): This is for theft where the offender prepares to cause death, hurt, or restraint to commit the theft or escape. The punishment is rigorous imprisonment up to ten years and a fine.

*****

2) EXTORTION (S. 308):-

SYNOPSIS

I. Introduction-

II. Definition (S.308):-

III. Ingredients of Extortion:-

1) Intentionally Putting a Person in Fear of Injury: -

2) Dishonest Inducement to Deliver Property etc: -

IV. Aggravated Forms of Extortion (Ss. 308):-

V. Difference between ‘Theft’ and ‘Extortion’:-

1) As to Property:-

2) As to Consent:-

3) As to Inducement / Delivery of Property:-

4) As to Force:-

VI. Conclusion-

I. Introduction-

The BNS, 2023 has replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860. The law on extortion, previously under IPC Sections 383-389, is now primarily defined in BNS Section 308. While the fundamental definition of extortion remains the same, the BNS provides a more organized structure, particularly for aggravated forms, by outlining distinct punishments within the same section. This change aims for greater clarity and efficiency.

II. Definition (S.308):-

i) Whoever,

ii) Intentionally,

iii) Puts any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to

any other, and

iv) Thereby, dishonestly induces the person so put in fear.

v) To deliver to any person any property or valuable security or anything

signed or sealed, which may be converted into a valuable security.

-Commits Extortion.

ILLUSTRATIONS

1. A threatens to publish a defamatory libel concerning Z, unless Z gives him money. He thus induces Z to give him money. A has committed extortion.

1. A threatens Z that he will keep Z’s child in wrongful confinement unless Z signs and delivers to A, a promissory note binding Z to pay certain moneys to A. Z signs and delivers the note. A has committed extortion.

Punishment: - Imprisonment up to 7 years or fine or both (S. 308 (2)).

III. Ingredients of Extortion: -

1) Intentionally Putting a Person in Fear of Injury: -

Intentionally putting a person in fear of injury to himself or another is the first requirement of the offence of extortion. S. 2 (14) of BNS defines ‘injury’ as “any harm whatever illegally caused to any person in body, reputation, or property.”

Thus, the injury that the person may be put in fear of is not necessarily a physical injury, but injury to the character may also be an injury.

2) Dishonest Inducement to Deliver Property etc: -

The second requirement of the offence of extortion is that the offence should have been committed with dishonest intention. Thus, the offender must dishonestly induce the person put in fear to deliver -

i) Any property

ii) Valuable security, or

iii) Anything signed or sealed which may be converted into a valuable security

IV. Aggravated Forms of Extortion (Ss. 308):-

1) Extortion by putting a person in fear of injury. Punishment- Imprisonment up to 2 years or with a fine, or with both (S. 308 (3).

2) Putting a person in fear of death or of grievous hurt to him or any other person, in order to or in attempt to commit extortion, Punishment- Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine (S.308 (4)).

     This clause deals with the attempt or the act of merely putting a person in such fear (death or grievous hurt), whether or not the extortion is actually successful.

3) Actual committing of extortion by putting any person in fear of death or of grievous hurt to him or any other person is punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years and fine (S. 308 (5)).

        This clause applies when extortion is actually committed (i.e., the victim delivers property/valuable security because of the fear of death or grievous hurt).

4)      In order to commit extortion, putting a person in fear of accusation of having committed an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life or of 10 years, is punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years and fine (S. 308 (6)). [Same difference as in clause (4) and (5) in Clauses (6) and (7)]

5) Actual committing extortion by putting any person in fear of accusation of offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life or of 10 years, is punishable with imprisonment up to 10 years and fine (S. 308 (7)).

V. Difference between ‘Theft’ and ‘Extortion’:-

The offences of ‘theft’ and ‘extortion’ have many common features. Both are offences against property. Both require ‘dishonest intention’ to constitute an offence. However, there are the following differences, viz-

1) As to Property: -

Extortion can be committed with reference to any kind of property, movable or immovable, whereas theft can be committed in respect of movable property only.

2) As to Consent: -

In extortion, the victim's consent is obtained wrongfully, whereas in theft, the property is moved or taken without the owner’s consent.

3) As to Inducement / Delivery of Property: -

In theft, the property is taken without the owner’s consent, whereas, in extortion, the person intimidated is induced to deliver the property.

4) As to Force: -

In theft, there exists no element of force, whereas in extortion, there always exists an element of force.

VI. Conclusion-

The BNS, 2023, has modernized the law on extortion, providing a more organized and comprehensive framework than the IPC. By consolidating provisions and clearly defining aggravated forms, it streamlines the legal process and ensures that the severity of the punishment aligns with the nature of the crime. The core principles of extortion—the use of fear to dishonestly induce the delivery of property—remain central to the law.

3) ROBBERY (Ss. 309):-

I. Introduction-

II. Definition: -

1) Theft is Robbery if: -

2) Extortion is Robbery: -

Explanation: -

3. Robbery is an Aggravated form of Theft or of Extortion: -

4. Punishment (S. 309 (4)). -

III. Aggravated forms of Robbery: -

I. Introduction-

    In the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, Robbery and Dacoity are distinct, yet related, offenses against property. Robbery is an aggravated form of either theft or extortion, while dacoity is an aggravated form of robbery itself. The key distinction lies in the number of offenders.

II. Definition: -

S.309 defines ‘Robbery’ as-

-In all ‘robbery’, there is either theft or extortion.

1) Theft is Robbery if: -

i) In order to the committing of the theft, or

ii) In committing the theft, or

iii) In carrying away, or attempting to carry away,

iv) property obtained by theft,

-the offender, for that end, voluntarily causes (or attempts to cause) to any person

i) Death, or

ii) Hurt, or

iii) Wrongful restraint, or

iv) Fear of instant death, hurt or wrongful restraint

2) Extortion is Robbery:-

If the offender, at the time of committing extortion-

i) Is in the presence of the person put in fear, and

ii) Commits the extortion by putting that person in fear of instant death, instant hurt, or instant wrongful restraint to that person or to some other person, and

iii) By so putting in fear, induces the person to put in fear then and there to deliver up the thing extorted.

Explanation: -

The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt or of instant wrongful restraint.

ILLUSTRATION

a) A holds Z down and fraudulently takes Z’s money and jewels from Z’s clothes without Z’s consent. Here, A has committed theft and, in order to commit that theft, has voluntarily caused wrongful restraint to Z. A has therefore committed robbery.

b) A meets Z on the high road, shows a pistol and demands Z’s purse. Z, in consequence, surrenders his purse. Here, A has extorted the purse from Z by putting him in fear of instant hurt and being at the time of committing the extortion in his presence. A has, therefore, committed robbery.

3. Robbery is an Aggravated form of Theft or of Extortion:-

    Thus, we may put the definition of robbery in equation form as

ROBBERY =	Theft, violence (or fear of instant violence), or
	Extortion + Offender Present + Fear of instant violence + immediate delivery.

4. Punishment (S. 309 (4)).-

Imprisonment up to 10 years and fine, the punishment is prescribed for robbery simpliciter.

5. Punishment for being a member of theft or robbery (S. 313)-

Whoever belongs to any gang of persons associated in habitually committing theft or robbery, and not being a gang of dacoits, shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

III. Aggravated forms of Robbery: -

1) If robbery is committed on the highway between sunset and sunrise, the imprisonment may be extended to fourteen years (S. 109 (4)).

2) Attempt to commit robbery is punishable with rigorous imprisonment up to seven years and a fine (S. 109 (5).

3) If a person voluntarily causes hurt during robbery or attempted robbery, the punishment can be imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment up to ten years and a fine (S. 109 (6)).

4) DACOITY (S. 310):-

SYNOPSIS

I. Introduction-

II. Definition (S. 310):-

Ingredients-

Punishment: -

III. Dacoity with Murder (S.310 (3)): -

III. Aggravated forms of ‘Dacoity’: -

IV. Allied Offences: -

1) Preparing to commit Dacoity (S. 310 (4)):-

2) Assembling for the Purpose of Committing Dacoity (S. 310 (5)):-

3) Belonging to a Gang of Dacoits (S.310 (6)):- .

V. Distinction between ‘Robbery’ and ‘Dacoity’:-

I. Introduction-

In the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, dacoity is an aggravated form of robbery and is dealt with under Section 310. It is distinguished from robbery primarily by the number of offenders involved. When five or more persons conjointly commit or attempt to commit a robbery, the crime is classified as dacoity. This legal distinction acknowledges the heightened danger and threat to public safety posed by a larger, organized group of criminals acting together, which is why it carries much more severe punishments than simple robbery, including life imprisonment or even the death penalty in certain circumstances.

Dacoity is an aggravated form of robbery, whereas; robbery is an aggravated form of either theft or extortion.

II. Definition (S. 310):-

(i) When five or more persons,

conjointly commit or attempt to commit a robbery, or

(ii) where the whole number of persons

a) conjointly committing or attempting to commit a robbery, and

b) persons present and aiding such commission or attempt, amount to five or more,

(iv) every person so committing, attempting or aiding, is said to commit 'dacoity'."

Ingredients-

For an act to be considered dacoity, the following conditions must be met:

1. The underlying offense must be robbery or an attempt to commit robbery.

1. The number of people involved, including both the perpetrators and those present to aid in the crime, must be five or more.

1. These individuals must act conjointly, meaning they are working together with a shared purpose to commit the crime.

Essentially, the BNS defines dacoity as a group crime, distinguishing it from robbery, which can be committed by one person or a smaller group.

Punishment: - For Dacoity, the punishment is imprisonment for life or with rigorous imprisonment for ten years and a fine (S. 310 (2)).

III. Dacoity with Murder (S.310 (3)):-

If any one of the dacoits commits murder while committing dacoity, every one of them is punishable with death, imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for ten years.

This section incorporates the principle of ‘constructive criminality.’

IV. Aggravated forms of ‘Dacoity’:-

Following are the aggravated forms of dacoity viz-.

1) Robbery or Dacoity, with deadly weapons or cause or attempts to cause death or grievous hurt is punishable with rigorous imprisonment for no less than seven years (S.311).

2) Attempt to commit robbery or Dacoity armed with deadly weapons, punishable with rigorous imprisonment for no less than seven years (S. 312).

V. Allied Offences:-

1) Preparing to commit Dacoity (S. 310 (4)): -

The general rule is that the preparation to commit an offence is not punishable, except in cases of preparation to commit Dacoity and preparation to wage war against the government of India. Thus, preparation to commit Dacoity is punishable with rigorous imprisonment up to seven years and fine.

2) Assembling for the Purpose of Committing Dacoity (S. 310 (5)):-

Assembling for the purpose of committing Dacoity is punishable with rigorous imprisonment of up to seven years and fine.

3) Belonging to a Gang of Dacoits (S.310 (6)):-

Belonging to a gang of dacoits is punishable with life imprisonment or rigorous imprisonment of up to ten years and a fine.

VI. Distinction between ‘Robbery’ and ‘Dacoity’:-

The distinction between ‘Robbery’ and ‘Dacoity’ lies in the number of persons involved in the offence. Robbery is Dacoity if committed by five or more persons.

5) CRIMINAL MISAPPROPRIATION OF PROPERTY

        (S. 314 and 315)

SYNOPSIS

I. Introduction-

II.    Dishonest misrepresentation of property

III.    Dishonest misappropriation of property possessed by the deceased person at the time

of his death (S. 314): -

IV. Difference between theft and criminal misappropriate

1) In theft, the object of the offender is to take property from others’ possession.

2) Moving

3) Consent

4) Previous/subsequent ‘dishonest intention’

V. Conclusion

I. Introduction-

The offence of ‘criminal misappropriation’ of the property consists of dishonest appropriation, or conversion, of another’s property to capitalise it for one’s own use. It may be that the possession of property might have been obtained or come innocently. However, a subsequent change of intention (dishonest) of possession makes the possession wrongful or fraudulent. In other words, initial possession may be valid, but due to a change in intention, it becomes invalid, i.e., ‘criminal misappropriation’.

II. Dishonest Misappropriation of Property (S. 314): -

Whoever dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use any movable property shall be imprisoned for not less than six months but may extend up to two years, and with fine.

Illustrations

1. A takes property belonging to Z out of Z’s possession in good faith, believing, at the time when he takes it, that the property belongs to himself. A is not guilty of theft, but if A, after discovering his mistake, dishonestly appropriates the property to his own use, he is guilty of an offence under this section.

1. A, being on friendly terms with Z, goes into Z’s library in Z’s absence and takes away a book without Z’s express consent. Here, if A was under the impression that he had Z’s implied consent to take the book for the purpose of reading it, A has not committed theft. But, if A afterwards sells the book for his own benefit, he is guilty of an offence under this section.

Explanation 1- A ‘dishonest misappropriation’ for a (short) term only is a

misappropriation within the meaning of this section.

Illustration

A finds a government promissory note belonging to Z, bearing a blank endorsement. A, knowing that the note belongs to Z, pledges it to a banker as security for the loan, intending to restore it to Z at a future time. A has committed an offence under this section.

Explanation 2 - A person who finds a property not in possession of any other person and takes such property for the purpose of protecting it or of restoring it to the owner does not take or misappropriate it dishonestly and is not guilty of an offence but he is guilty of the offence above defined, if he appropriates it to his own use, when he knows or has the means of discovering the owner, or before he has used reasonable means to discover and give notice to the owner and has kept the property for a reasonable time to enable the owner to claim it.

    What are reasonable means? or what is a reasonable time in such a case? It is a question of fact.

    It is not necessary that the finder should know who is the owner of the property or that any particular person is the owner of it; it is sufficient if, at the time of appropriating it, he does not believe it to be his own property, or in good faith believes that real owner cannot be found.

Illustration

1. A finds a rupee on the high road; not knowing to whom the rupee belongs, A picks up the rupee. Here, A has not committed the offence defined in this section.

1. A finds a letter on the road containing a bank note. From the direction and contents of the letter, he learns to whom the note belongs. He appropriates the note. He is guilty of an offence under this section.

It appears from the above definition and illustrations that there are the following two ingredients of the offence: -

1) Dishonest misappropriation or conversion of property for a person’s own use

2) Property must be movable.

III. Dishonest Misappropriation of Property Possessed by the Deceased Person at the Time of his Death (S. 315): -

Whoever dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use property, knowing that such property was in possession of a deceased person at the time of that person’s decease and has not since been in possession of any person legally entitled to such possession, shall be punished with imprisonment up to three years and shall also be liable to fine. If he employed the offender at the time of such person's decease as a clerk or servant, the imprisonment may extend to seven years.

Illustration

Z dies in possession of furniture and money. Before the money comes into the possession of any person entitled to such possession, his servant A dishonestly misappropriates it. A has committed the offence defined in this section.

IV.    Difference between ‘Theft’ and ‘Criminal Misappropriation’:-

    Following are the points of distinction between ‘theft’ and ‘criminal misappropriation’.

1. In theft, the object of the offender is to take property from another’s possession, whereas, in ‘criminal misappropriation’, the offender already possesses the property.

1. Moving: -

Moving the property is an important ingredient of theft. The initial moving of property may be lawful, but the subsequent ‘dishonest’ intention to misappropriate or convert the property to his own use is the offence.

1. Consent: -

In theft, the moving of property takes place without the consent of the owner.

However, in ‘criminal misappropriation’, the possession of the property may be with the express or implied consent of the owner.

1. Previous/subsequent ‘dishonest intention’:-

In theft, the dishonest intention precedes the act of taking.

Whereas, in ‘criminal misappropriation of property,’ it is the subsequent change in intention to misappropriate or convert the property for one’s own use that constitutes the offence.

V. Conclusion-

    In conclusion, both dishonest misappropriation and theft are offenses against property, but they are distinct in their legal and factual elements. The BNS, 2023, meticulously delineates these offenses to ensure that different criminal acts, and the intentions behind them, are addressed with appropriate legal consequences. Understanding the nuances, particularly the timing of the dishonest intent, is crucial for correctly applying these provisions and is a fundamental aspect of the study of criminal law.

6) CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST (Ss. 316):-

SYNOPSIS

I. Introduction-

II. Definition: -

Explanations 1 and 2: -

Entrustment of Property: -    

III]    Aggravated Forms of the Offence: -    

IV]    Difference between “Criminal Misappropriation of Property” and “Criminal Breach of Trust”: -

1) Receiving Property: -

2) Contractual Relationship: -

3) Conversion: -

V. Conclusion-

I. Introduction-

Criminal breach of trust is a serious offence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, defined in Section 316. It involves the dishonest misappropriation of property that was specifically entrusted to a person. Unlike offences like theft, which involve a wrongful taking of property from the outset, a criminal breach of trust is a violation of a fiduciary relationship. The accused's initial possession of the property is lawful, but their subsequent dishonest use or disposal of it, in violation of a trust or contract, constitutes the crime. The BNS outlines varying levels of punishment based on the offender's role, with more severe penalties for public servants and those in positions of high authority.

II. Definition: -

Generally, any deliberate or negligent failure to implement the duties incumbent by law on a trustee or a person in the fiduciary position is a breach of trust’.

    Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property or dominion over property,

a) Dishonestly misappropriates, or

b) Converts to his own use that property, or

c) Uses or disposes of that property.

In violation of-

a) any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged. or

b) of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or

c) Willfully, suffers any other person so to do,

--commits ‘Criminal Breach of Trust.’

Punishment is imprisonment for five years, or with a fine or both (S. 316 (2))

Explanations 1 and 2: -

Explanation 1 and 2 to this section provide that an employer deducting an employee’s contribution from his wages for credit to a Provident Fund or to a Family Pension Fund established by law or to the Employees' State Insurance Fund Established under law shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount. If he makes any default in payment of such contribution to the said fund in violation of law, he shall be deemed to have dishonestly used that amount in violation of a direction of law.

Illustration

1. A, being executor to the will of a deceased person, dishonestly disobeys the law, which directs him to divide the effects (proceeds) according to the will and appropriates them for his own use. A has committed a criminal breach of trust.

1. A is a warehouse keeper. Z, going on a journey, entrusts his furniture to A under a contract that it shall be returned upon payment of a stipulated sum for the warehouse room. A dishonestly sells the goods. A has committed a criminal breach of trust

Entrustment of Property:-

    To constitute a criminal breach of trust, there must be an entrustment of property or any dominion over it. Secondly, it has to be established that in respect of the property so entrusted, there was dishonest misappropriation or dishonest conversion or dishonest use or disposal in violation of a direction of law or legal contract by the accused himself or by somebody else, which he willingly suffered to do. The term ‘entrustment’ implies the handing over of the possession of a thing for some purpose, which may not imply the conferring of any proprietary right. Entrustment may be in any manner. Thus, property was entrusted to the director of the company, collection of land revenue by a Tahsildar handing over partnership property to a partner, currency notes were taken by police while searching, and a woman’s property (Stridhan) was in the hands of the in-laws’ family are all instances of ‘entrustment’.

III]    Aggravated Forms of the Offence: -

    Following are the aggravated (i.e., punishable severely) forms of offences of ‘criminal breach of trust.”

1. Criminal Breach of trust by carrier, wharfinger, or warehouse keeper is punishable for imprisonment up to 7 years and fine (S. 316 (3)).

1. Criminal Breach of trust by clerk or servant is punishable for imprisonment up to 7 years and fine (S. 316 (4)).

1. Criminal Breach of trust by a public servant, banker, merchant, or agent is punishable for with imprisonment for life, or up to 10 years and fine (S. 316 (5)).

IV]    Difference between “Criminal Misappropriation of Property” and “Criminal Breach of Trust”: -

1) Receiving Property: -

In ‘misappropriation,’ property comes into the possession of the accused legally or otherwise, and he afterwards misappropriates it.

Meanwhile, in a ‘criminal breach of trust,’ the offender is lawfully entrusted with the property, and he dishonestly misappropriates it subsequently.

2) Contractual Relationship: -

In ‘criminal breach’ of trust, a contractual relationship exists between the parties, whereas, in ‘misappropriation’, a contractual relationship does not exist.

3) Conversion: -

In ‘criminal breach of trust’, there is the conversion of property held in a fiduciary character, whereas, in ‘misappropriation’, there is the conversion of property coming into possession of the offender anyhow.

V. Conclusion-

Criminal breach of trust, as defined in Section S. 316 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, is a robust legal mechanism for protecting the sanctity of trust in various relationships, from personal to professional and public. By consolidating and enhancing the previous legal provisions, the BNS provides a clear framework for prosecuting individuals who betray their duties and dishonestly misuse entrusted property. The graded punishments reflect a modern legal philosophy that accounts for the harm caused by such breaches, particularly when they involve public servants or financial agents. This offense underscores the principle that the law not only protects a person's physical possession of property but also their right to entrust it to others without fear of a wilful and dishonest betrayal.

7) CHEATING (S. 318 to 420)

SYNOPSIS

I. Introduction-

II. Definition:-

Explanation: -

Punishment: -

III. Aggravated Forms of Cheating.

Punishment: -

IV. Other sections in the BNS regarding the personation of-

V. Difference between ‘Theft’ ‘Criminal Misappropriation’, and ‘Cheating’:-

1. As to Nature:-

2. As to Property-

3. As to Possession-

VI. Conclusion-

I. Introduction-

    Cheating is a pervasive form of economic crime that strikes at the heart of transactional trust, and its updated provisions in the BNS reflect a more robust and comprehensive approach to deterring fraudulent conduct. This note will provide a detailed analysis of cheating as an offense under the BNS, examining its foundational elements, its specific forms, the punishments prescribed, and its distinction from other related offenses.

II. Definition: -

S. 318 defines cheating as -

Whoever, by deceiving any person-

1. Fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived-

i) To deliver any property to any person, or

ii) To consent that any person shall retain any property, or

1. Intentionally induces the person so deceived to do or omit to do anything which he would not do or omit if he were not so deceived, and

1. Which act or omission causes or is likely to cause damage or harm to that person in body, mind, reputation, or property - is said to ‘cheat’.

Explanation: -

A dishonest concealment of facts is a deception within the meaning of this section.

Punishment: -

Punishment for cheating is imprisonment for up to three years, or with fine, or both.

Illustration

1. A, by falsely pretending to be in the Civil Service, intentionally deceives Z, and thus dishonestly induces Z to let him have on credit goods for which he does not mean to pay. A cheat.

1. A, by putting a counterfeit mark on an article, intentionally deceives Z into a belief that a certain celebrated manufacturer made this article, and thus dishonestly induces Z to buy and pay for the article. A cheat.

III. Aggravated Forms of Cheating-

1) Cheating with knowledge that wrongful loss will thereby be caused to a person

whose interest the offender is bound to protect, is punishable with imprisonment up to five years, or a fine, or both (S.318 (3)).

2) Cheating and dishonestly inducing the delivery of property, punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years and a fine. (S. S. 318 (4)).

3) Cheating by personation (S. 319)

A person is said to cheat by personation if he cheats by -

i) Pretending to be some other person, or by

ii) Knowingly substituting one person for another, or

iii) Representing that he or any other person is a person

other than he or such other person really is -

- cheats by personation’.

Punishment: - For ‘cheating by personation’, the punishment is imprisonment of up to 5 years, or fine, or both. (S. 319 (2)).

Illustrations

(a) A cheat by pretending to be a certain rich banker of the same name. A cheats by personation.

(b) A cheats by pretending to be B, a person who is deceased. A cheat by personation.

IV. Other sections in the BNS regarding the personation of-

1) Personation at election (S.172)

2) A public servant (S. 204)

3) Wearing garb or carrying the token used by a public servant (S.168)

4) Personation for the purposes of an act of proceeding in a suit or prosecution (S. 242)

6) An assessor (S. 268).

V. Difference between ‘Theft’ ‘Criminal Misappropriation’, and ‘Cheating’:-

There are the following differences between these three:

1. As to Nature: -

In theft, the intention is to take a movable property dishonestly out of the possession of another person.

In ‘misappropriation’ the intention is to dishonestly misappropriate or convert to

his own use of any movable property.

In the case of ‘cheating’, the intention is to fraudulently or dishonestly induce the

deceived person to deliver any property.

2. As to Property-

In ‘theft’ and ‘criminal misrepresentation,’ the property involved is movable, whereas ‘cheating’ may take place in respect of movable as well as immovable property.

3. As to Possession-

In theft, the property is taken out of the possession of another.

In ‘misappropriation’, the offender already possesses the property.

In ‘cheating’, the victim is induced to deliver the property to the offender.

VI. Conclusion-

The BNS, 2023, has effectively streamlined the legal framework for the offense of cheating, making it more contemporary and robust. By consolidating the fragmented provisions of the IPC into a few clear sections, it has simplified the law and clarified the essential elements of the crime. The tiered punishments and specific provisions for cheating by personation and breach of duty demonstrate a legislative intent to impose harsher penalties on those who misuse positions of trust and authority to commit fraud. As a victim-centric law, the BNS provides greater protection for individuals and organizations from the evolving nature of fraudulent activities, reaffirming the importance of honesty and integrity in all societal interactions.

(.. 8…)

Receiving Stolen Property

(S. 317)

Synopsis

I. Introduction-

II. Definition and Essential Ingredients-

1. Definition-

2. The essential ingredients are:

a. Dishonest Receipt or Retention:

b. Knowledge or Reason to Believe:

c. The Property Must Be "Stolen":

III. Aggravated Forms of the Offense

1. General Punishment (Section 317(2)):

1. Receiving Stolen Property from a Dacoity (Section 317(3)):

1. Habitually Dealing in Stolen Property (Section 28317(4)):

1. Assisting in Concealing Stolen Property (Section 317(5)):

IV. Conclusion-

I. Introduction

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, places a strong emphasis on strengthening the legal framework surrounding offenses against property. The crime of "receiving stolen property" is a crucial component of this framework, designed to deter not only the initial act of stealing but also the subsequent transactions that sustain the criminal enterprise.6 This offense, now consolidated under Section 7317 of the BNS, holds individuals accountable for their role in the chain of crime, even if they were not the original perpetrator.8 This topic will examine the definition, core elements, and various aggravated forms of this offense, highlighting its importance in protecting property rights and promoting justice.

II. Definition and Essential Ingredients-

1. Definition-

The BNS provides a comprehensive definition of "stolen property" in Section 317(1). It designates property as "stolen" if its possession has been transferred by:

1. Theft9

2. Extortion10

3. Robbery11

4. Cheating12

5. Criminal Misappropriation13

6. Criminal Breach of Trust14

This broad definition ensures that property obtained through a wide range of dishonest means falls under the purview of this offense.15 The property ceases to be "stolen" if it is subsequently recovered by a person legally entitled to its possession.16

The core offense of receiving stolen property is defined in Section 17317(2): "Whoever dishonestly receives or retains any stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen property, shall be punished.

2. The essential ingredients are:

a. Dishonest Receipt or Retention: The accused must either receive the property from another person or continue to retain it in their possession.19 The act must be done with a dishonest intention, i.e., with the aim of causing wrongful gain to themselves or wrongful loss to the rightful owner.

b. Knowledge or Reason to Believe: This is the most critical element. The prosecution must prove that the accused either knew the property was stolen or had a "reason to believe" that it was.21 This is often inferred from circumstantial evidence, such as the unusually low price of an item or the lack of proper documentation.

c. The Property Must Be "Stolen": The property in question must satisfy the definition of "stolen property" as outlined in Section 317(1).

III. Aggravated Forms of the Offense

The BNS, 2023, prescribes a tiered punishment structure for receiving stolen property based on the severity of the original crime or the habitual nature of the offender.

1. General Punishment (Section 317(2)): For dishonestly receiving or retaining any stolen property, the punishment is imprisonment for up to three years, or a fine, or both.25 This is the general offense and is applicable in most cases.

1. Receiving Stolen Property from a Dacoity (Section 317(3)): A much more severe punishment is prescribed if the property was stolen during a dacoity (robbery committed by five or more persons).26 The punishment for dishonestly receiving or retaining such property is imprisonment for a term that may extend to ten years, and the offender is also liable to a fine.27

1. Habitually Dealing in Stolen Property (Section 28317(4)): This provision targets career criminals who operate as fences or in the black market for stolen goods.29 The offense is defined as habitually receiving or dealing in property that one knows or has reason to believe is stolen.30 The punishment for this offense is imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for a term of up to ten years, and a fine.31

1. Assisting in Concealing Stolen Property (Section 317(5)): This provision criminalizes acts that aid the original perpetrator. Anyone who voluntarily assists in concealing, disposing of, or making away with property that they know or have reason to believe is stolen, is liable for punishment.32 The punishment for this is imprisonment for up to three years, or a fine, or both.33

IV. Conclusion-

The provisions for "Receiving Stolen Property" under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, are a testament to the law's intention to create a comprehensive and effective legal deterrent against property crime. By criminalizing not just the act of stealing, but also the act of knowingly facilitating the concealment or sale of stolen goods, the BNS seeks to disrupt the entire criminal ecosystem.34 The graded punishments based on the nature of the crime and the offender's conduct ensure that justice is meted out in a proportionate manner.35 The inclusion of new forms of punishment like community service for minor theft cases and the consolidation of various provisions reflect a modern approach to criminal law that is both stringent and reformative.

8) MISCHIEF (S.425 to 440):-

SYNOPSIS

I] Definition

II] Aggravated forms of mischief Aggravated forms (Ss.427-440)

I. Introduction-

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, has brought a contemporary approach to India's criminal law by consolidating and modernizing the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860. Among the offenses re-codified in the BNS is "mischief," which deals with the malicious destruction or damage of property. Mischief is distinct from other property offenses like theft because the core element is not the unlawful acquisition of property, but rather the deliberate intent to cause harm to it, thereby inflicting a wrongful loss on the owner or the public. The BNS, in its new structure, provides a comprehensive framework to address this offense, with a focus on proportionality and clarity.

II. Definition (S. 324 (1): -

A person commits mischief if he -

i) with the intention to cause or knowing that he is likely to cause wrongful loss or damage to-

a) the public, or

b) any person

ii) Causes: -

a) the destruction of any property, or

b) any such change in any property or the situation thereof, or destroys or diminishes its utility or affects it injuriously.

Punishment: -

For mischief, the punishment is up to 6 months or a fine or both (S 324 (2)).

Explanations-

Explanation 1 states that it is not essential for the offender to intend to cause loss to the owner of the damaged property; it is sufficient if the intent is to cause wrongful loss to any person.

Explanation 2 clarifies that mischief can be committed against property belonging to the person who commits the act, or to that person and others jointly.

Illustration

1. A voluntarily burns a valuable security belonging to Z, intending to cause wrongful loss to Z. A has committed mischief.

1. A introduces water into an ice-house belonging to Z and thus causes the ice to melt, intending wrongful loss to Z, A has committed mischief.

III.    Aggravated Forms of Mischief-

The following are aggravated forms of mischief: -

1. Committing mischief and thereby causing loss or damage to any property, including the property of Government or Local Authority is liable to imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine, or both (S. 324 (3).

2. Whoever commits mischief and thereby causes loss or damage to the amount of twenty thousand rupees and more but less than one lakh rupees shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both (S. 324 (4).

3. If a person commits mischief and causes a loss of property amounting to or exceeding one lakh rupees, they shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years, or a fine, or both. This provision details the enhanced punishment for mischief causing significant financial damage (S. 324 (5).

4. If a person commits mischief after making preparations to cause death, hurt, or wrongful restraint to another person, they can be imprisoned for up to five years, in addition to a fine (324 (6)).

5. Killing or maiming any animal, which is an offense punishable with up to five years in prison, a fine, or both. The law no longer makes a distinction based on the value of the animal, providing uniform protection for all animals (S. 325).

6. Mischief committed with fire or explosive substances, with the punishment being up to seven years in prison and a fine. If this act destroys a dwelling or place of worship, the punishment can be imprisonment for life (S. 326).

7. Mischief with the intent to destroy or make a train, aircraft, or large vessel unsafe. It is punishable by imprisonment for up to ten years, with harsher penalties if fire or explosives are used (S. 327).

8. Intentional act of running a vessel aground or ashore with the explicit purpose of committing theft. This offence is punishable with imprisonment for up to ten years and a fine (S. 328).

IV. Conclusion-

The BNS, 2023, has made the offence of mischief more structured and aligned with modern legal principles. By providing clear definitions, graded punishments based on the value of the damage, and specific provisions for property of the government and local authorities, the new law strengthens the protection of public and private property. The illustrations provided within the statute are particularly helpful in clarifying the subtle nuances of the offence, emphasizing that the key element is the malicious intent to cause wrongful loss. The BNS's holistic approach ensures that acts of vandalism and property destruction, whether against an individual or the state, are met with a proportionate and effective legal response.

****

(..9..)

Criminal Trespass and House Trespass

I. Introduction-

II. The Basic Offense of Trespass-

1. Criminal Trespass (Section 329)-

a. Definition:

b. Punishment:

2. House-trespass (Section S. 329)-

a. Definition:

b. Punishment:

III. Aggravated Forms of Trespass-

1. Lurking House-trespass and House-breaking (S. 330)-

a. Lurking House-trespass (S. 330 (1)):

b. House-breaking (S. 330 (2)):

(i) Passage made by self or abettor-

(ii) Unauthorized route or scaling-

(iii) Opening a passage not intended by occupier-

(iv) Opening a lock-

(v) Using force or threats-

(vi) Unfastening a fastened passage-

2. Punishments for Lurking House-trespass and House-breaking (Section 331)-

a. Simple lurking house-trespass or house-breaking,

b. Lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night,

c. House-trespass or house-breaking with intent to commit offence punishable with imprisonment,

d. House-trespass or house-breaking with intent to commit offence at night,

e. House-trespass or house-breaking after preparation for hurt, assault, or wrongful restraint,

f. House-trespass or house-breaking at night with preparation for hurt, assault, or wrongful restraint

g. House-trespass or house-breaking causing grievous hurt or attempt to cause death/grievous hurt,

h. Night house-breaking with grievous hurt or attempt, by several persons,

3. House-trespass in Order to Commit an Offense (S. 332)-

a) punishable with death,-

(b) punishable with imprisonment for life-

(c) punishable with imprisonment-,

Provided that if the offence intended to be committed is theft

4. House-Trespass After Preparation for Hurt, Assault or Wrongful Restraint (S. 333)-

5. House breaking by night (Section 334)-

IV. Conclusion-

I. Introduction-

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, has replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC) with a streamlined and modern legal framework. Among the many offenses re-codified in the BNS are those related to "Criminal Trespass," which are meticulously detailed in a series of sections. This legal classification is crucial as it protects not only the physical boundaries of a person's property but also the sense of security and peace of mind of the occupants. The BNS, from Sections 329 to 334, creates a clear hierarchy of offenses, moving from a simple act of trespass to highly dangerous and clandestine acts, each with a corresponding increase in legal consequences.

II. The Basic Offense of Trespass-

1. Criminal Trespass (Section 329)-

a. Definition:

Section 329(1) of the BNS defines criminal trespass as an act where a person either enters or remains on another's property with a specific malicious intent. This intent can be to commit a separate offense, or to intimidate, insult, or annoy the lawful possessor. The offense can also be committed if the entry was initially lawful, but the person remains there with a new criminal intent.

b. Punishment:

The punishment for criminal trespass under Section S. 329(3) is imprisonment for up to three months, or a fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or both.

2. House-trespass (Section S. 329)-

a. Definition:

This is a specific and more serious form of criminal trespass. According to Section S. 329(2), it is committed when the trespasser enters or remains in any building, tent, or vessel used as a human dwelling, or as a place of worship, or for the custody of property. The law clarifies that even introducing a part of the body into the structure is sufficient for this offense.

b. Punishment:

The punishment for house-trespass under Section S. 329(4) is imprisonment for up to one year, or a fine of up to five thousand rupees, or both.

III. Aggravated Forms of Trespass-

The BNS further distinguishes more serious forms of trespass, where the manner of entry or the time of the offense escalates the crime's severity.

1. Lurking House-trespass and House-breaking (S. 330)-

a. Lurking House-trespass (S. 330 (1)):

A person commits lurking house-trespass when he takes precaution to conceal their trespass from the person who has the right to exclude them. The intent is to hide the act to facilitate the crime.

b. House-breaking (S. 330 (2)):

Housebreaking occurs when a person engages in housetrespass and effects entry into or exit from a house (or part thereof) via any of the following six ways:

(i) Passage made by self or abettor-

Entering or leaving through a passage deliberately created by the offender or their accomplice to facilitate the trespass.

(ii) Unauthorized route or scaling-

Using a passage not intended for human entry, such as a ventilation shaft, or gaining access by scaling or climbing over walls or other structures not meant for ingress.

(iii) Opening a passage not intended by occupier-

Entering or exiting through a passage which the offender or their accomplice has opened for trespass, and which was not intended by the lawful occupier to be used.

(iv) Opening a lock-

Entering or leaving the property by opening any lock, whether to gain access or to exit after committing the trespass.

(v) Using force or threats-

Effecting entry or departure by using criminal force, assaulting, or threatening any person with assault.

(vi) Unfastening a fastened passage-

Entering or leaving via a passage that was fastened, which the offender or an abettor has unfastened, knowing it was intended to be kept closed.

Additionally, the statute clarifies that any outhouse or structure connected internally with the main house (i.e., having immediate internal communication) is also considered part of the house for these purposes—a vital note for legal interpretation.

Illustrations

(a) A commits house-trespass by making a hole through the wall of Z’s house, and putting his hand through the aperture. This is house-breaking.

(b) A commits house-trespass by creeping into a ship at a port-hole between decks. This is house-breaking.

(c) A commits house-trespass by entering Z’s house through a window. This is house-breaking. 2. Punishments for Lurking House-trespass and House-breaking (Section 331)-

The section lays down the punishments for aggravated forms of house-trespass and house-breaking. The section has eight parts which deal with different situations and prescribe increasing punishments depending on the seriousness of the offence.

a. Simple lurking house-trespass or house-breaking, the punishment may extend to two years imprisonment and fine (Section 331(1)).

b. Lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night, the punishment may extend to three years imprisonment and fine (Section 331(2)).

c. House-trespass or house-breaking with intent to commit offence punishable with imprisonment, the punishment may extend to three years imprisonment and fine.
If the offence intended is theft, the punishment may extend to ten years imprisonment (Section 331(3)).

d. House-trespass or house-breaking with intent to commit offence at night, the punishment may extend to five years imprisonment and fine (Section 331(4).
If the intended offence is theft, the punishment may extend to fourteen years imprisonment.

e. House-trespass or house-breaking after preparation for hurt, assault, or wrongful restraint, the punishment may extend to ten years imprisonment and fine (Section 331(5): .

f. House-trespass or house-breaking at night with preparation for hurt, assault, or wrongful restraint, punishment may extend to fourteen years imprisonment and fine (Section 331(6)).

g. House-trespass or house-breaking causing grievous hurt or attempt to cause death/grievous hurt, the punishment is life imprisonment, or imprisonment up to ten years and fine (Section 331(7)).

h. Night house-breaking with grievous hurt or attempt, by several persons, every participant is punishable with life imprisonment or imprisonment up to ten years and fine (Section 331(8)).

3. House-trespass in Order to Commit an Offense (S. 332)-

Whoever commits housetrespass in order to the committing of any offence—

(a) punishable with death,- Punished with imprisonment for life, or with rigorous imprisonment up to ten years, and fine.

(b) punishable with imprisonment for life- Punished with imprisonment up to ten years, and fine.

(c) punishable with imprisonment-, Punished with imprisonment up to two years, and fine.

Provided that if the offence intended to be committed is theft-, the term of the imprisonment may be extended to seven years.

4. House-Trespass After Preparation for Hurt, Assault or Wrongful Restraint (S. 333)-

Whoever commits house-trespass after making preparation to cause hurt, assault, wrongful restraint, or to put any person in fear of such harm, shall be punished with imprisonment up to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.

5. House breaking by night (Section 334)-

House-breaking by night is an aggravated form of trespass committed by breaking into a house between sunset and sunrise. The punishment for this offense is imprisonment for up to five years, or a fine, or both, with a more severe penalty if the intent is to commit a serious offense like theft.

IV. Conclusion-

The BNS, 2023, provides a robust and logical framework for the offense of criminal trespass. By clearly defining the degrees of the crime—from simple trespass to the highly aggravated forms of house-breaking by night—the law ensures that the punishment is proportionate to the criminal's intent, the level of intrusion, and the potential threat posed to the occupants. The detailed sections, particularly those addressing the methods of entry and the time of the offense, reflect a modern legal approach focused on both deterring crime and upholding the fundamental right of an individual to the sanctity of their property.

*****

Good question 👌. In the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, offences are divided into chapters. Offences against property are grouped mainly in Chapter XVII (Sections 303 to 331). These provisions broadly carry forward the offences from the IPC, 1860 (Chapter XVII: Sections 378–462), but with some consolidation and re-numbering.

Here’s a structured list for you:

Offences Against Property under BNS, 2023

I. Theft (Sections 303–308)

1. Section 303 – Theft (definition).

1. Section 304 – Theft in a dwelling house, tent, vessel, place of worship.

1. Section 305 – Theft by clerk or servant of property in possession of master.

1. Section 306 – Theft after preparation for causing death, hurt, or restraint.

1. Section 307 – Theft by dishonest abstraction of electricity (newly included more clearly).

1. Section 308 – Theft in respect of computer resources (cyber theft).

II. Extortion (Sections 309–311)

1. Section 309 – Extortion (definition).

1. Section 310 – Putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt to commit extortion.

1. Section 311 – Putting a person in fear of accusation of an offence to commit extortion.

III. Robbery and Dacoity (Sections 312–317)

1. Section 312 – Robbery (definition, includes theft/ extortion with violence).

1. Section 313 – Dacoity (robbery by five or more persons).

1. Section 314 – Making preparation to commit dacoity.

1. Section 315 – Punishment for attempting to commit robbery or dacoity.

1. Section 316 – Belonging to a gang of dacoits.

1. Section 317 – Belonging to a gang of robbers.

IV. Criminal Misappropriation and Criminal Breach of Trust (Sections 318–322)

1. Section 318 – Dishonest misappropriation of property.

1. Section 319 – Criminal breach of trust (general).

1. Section 320 – Criminal breach of trust by a public servant, banker, agent, etc.

1. Section 321 – Criminal breach of trust by clerk or servant.

1. Section 322 – Dishonest misappropriation of property possessed by deceased person at the time of death.

V. Receiving Stolen Property (Sections 323–325)

1. Section 323 – Dishonestly receiving stolen property.

1. Section 324 – Habitually dealing in stolen property.

1. Section 325 – Assisting in concealment or disposal of stolen property.

VI. Cheating and Fraud (Sections 326–329)

1. Section 326 – Cheating (general definition).

1. Section 327 – Cheating by personation.

1. Section 328 – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

1. Section 329 – Fraudulent deeds and dispossession of property.

VII. Mischief (Sections 330–331)

1. Section 330 – Mischief (definition – causing wrongful loss or damage).

1. Section 331 – Mischief by killing or maiming animals, destroying property, etc.

VIII. Other Property-Related Offences (scattered references)

1. Section 332 onwards (next chapter) deals with Criminal Trespass, House-Trespass, Housebreaking, and related offences, which are also linked with property.

1. Cyber-related property offences are now expressly mentioned (e.g., theft of a computer resource in Section 308). `