“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 223
(..24..)
Forgery and Making of False Documents
(Chapter XVIII, Section 335 to 344)
QUESTION BANK
Q. 1. Define 'Forgery'. Discuss in detail the essential ingredients of the offence of making
a False Document.
SHORT NOTES
1. Making a False Document or False Electronic Record
2. Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record
SYNOPSIS
.
I. Introduction-
II. Making a false document (S. 335)-
(A) Creates or makes a document-
1. Who dishonestly or fraudulently-
2. with the intention of causing it to be believed
(B) Alters-
(C) Causes a person to execute/alter-
(D). Explanations to the section-
Explanation 1: A man’s signature of his own name may amount to forgery.
“Law Master’s Publication”
Explanation 2: The making of a false document in the name of a fictious person,
III. Forgery (S. 336)-
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 224
1. Core Offence: Forgery (Section 336)-
Punishment for committing forgery-
IV. Aggravated forms of forgery-
1. Forgery of record of court or of public register, etc (S. 337)-
2. Forgery of Valuable Security, Will, etc. (S. 338)-
3. Having in possession and intending it to be used as genuine (S. 339)-
V. Allied offences of forgery-
1. Forged document or electronic record and using it as genuine (S. 340)-
2. Making or possessing counterfeit seal, etc., with intent to commit forgery
punishable under section 336 (or 338) (S. 341)-
3. Counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described
in section 336, or possessing counterfeit marked material (S. 342)-
4. Fraudulent cancellation, destruction, etc., of will, authority to adopt, or
valuable security (S. 343)-
5. Falsification of accounts (S. 344)-
VI. Conclusion-
(1) Defining the act of Forgery (Section 336) and
(2) Establishing various allied offences
a. The Act of Forgery (336, 337, 338):
b. Using and Possessing Forgeries (339 and 340): The BNS ensures accountability for the entire
chain of crime.
c. Preparation, Tools, and Destruction (341, 342, 343):
d. Internal Fraud (344):
I. Introduction-
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, has replaced the Indian Penal Code,
1860, with the objective of modernizing and simplifying criminal law in India. One of its
significant areas of reform is the law relating to documents, forgery, and false records.
The making of false documents has always been recognized as a serious threat to trust in
personal, commercial, and governmental transactions. With the growth of electronic
communication and digital record-keeping, the legislature has expanded the definition of
false documents to expressly include electronic records, thereby bringing digital frauds
under the same penal framework as traditional paper-based forgeries.
Forgery under BNS, 2023, is not limited to the mere act of producing a false
document but is anchored in the wrongful intention behind such an act. The law
“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 225
distinguishes between simply making a false document and committing forgery, the latter
requiring a specific intention such as causing damage, inducing someone to part with
property, or facilitating fraud. By covering aggravated forms like forgery of valuable
securities, wills, and public records with harsher punishments, BNS ensures protection of
both private rights and public interests.
The law on Forgery and Making of False Documents is contained in the Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, primarily under Sections 335 to 344 (corresponding to
Sections 463 to 477A of the old Indian Penal Code, 1860).
The BNS structure clearly separates the foundational act of 'Making a False
Document' from the substantive offence of 'Forgery' and then details its aggravated forms.
II. Making a false document (S. 335)-
Section 335 defines the offence of 'Making a False Document' (which corresponds to
Section 464 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860). It includes various modes by which a document or
record may be manipulated.
According to S. 335, A person is said to make a false document or false electronic record,
(A) Creates or makes a document-
1. Who dishonestly or fraudulently-
(i) makes, signs, seals or executes a document or part of a document;
(ii) makes or transmits any electronic record or part of any electronic record;
(iii) affixes any electronic signature on any electronic record;
(iv) makes any mark denoting the execution of a document or the authenticity of
the electronic signature,
2. with the intention of causing it to be believed
-that such document or part of document, electronic record or electronic signature
-was made, signed, sealed, executed, transmitted or affixed
-by or by the authority of a person by whom or by whose authority he knows that
it was -not made, signed, sealed, executed or affixed; or
Illustrations:
A has a letter of credit upon B for rupees 10,000, written by Z. A, in order to
defraud B, adds cipher to the 10,000, and makes the sum 1,00,000 intending that it may
be believed by B that Z so wrote the letter. A has committed forgery.
A, without Z’s authority, affixes Z’s seal to a document purporting to be a
conveyance of an estate from Z to A, with the intention of selling the estate to B and
thereby of obtaining from B the purchase-money. A has committed forgery.
A picks up a cheque on a banker signed by B, payable to bearer, but without any sum
having been inserted in the cheque. A fraudulently fills up the cheque by inserting the
“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 226
sum of ten thousand rupees. A commits forgery.
A leaves with B, his agent, a cheque on a banker, signed by A, without inserting
the sum payable and authorises B to fill up the cheque by inserting a sum not exceeding
ten thousand rupees for the purpose of making certain payments. B fraudulently fills up
the cheque by inserting the sum of twenty thousand rupees. B commits forgery.
A draws a bill of exchange on himself in the name of B without B’s authority,
intending to discount it as a genuine bill with a banker and intending to take up the bill on
its maturity. Here, as A draws the bill with intent to deceive the banker by leading him to
suppose that he had the security of B, and thereby to discount the bill, A is guilty of
forgery.
(B) Alters-
Who without lawful authority, dishonestly or fraudulently-
-by cancellation or otherwise,
-alters a document or an electronic record in any material part thereof,
-after it has been made, executed or affixed with electronic signature
-either by himself or by any other person, (whether such person be living or dead
-at the time of such alteration); or
Illustrations
Z’s will contains these word “I direct that all my remaining property be equally
divided between A, B and C.” A dishonestly scratches out B’s name, intending that it may
be believed that the whole was left to himself and C. A has committed forgery.
A endorses a Government promissory note and makes it payable to Z or his order
by writing on the bill the words “Pay to Z or his order” and signing the endorsement. B
dishonestly erases the words “Pay to Z or his order”, and thereby converts the special
endorsement into a blank endorsement. B commits forgery.
(C) Causes a person to execute/alter-
Who dishonestly or fraudulently
-causes any person to sign, seal, execute or alter a document or an electronic record
or to affix his electronic signature on any electronic record
-knowing that such person by reason of mental illness or intoxication cannot, or
that by reason of deception practised upon him,
-(he) does not know the contents of the document or electronic record or the nature
of the alteration.
Illustrations
Z dictates his will to A. A intentionally writes down a different legatee named by
Z, and by representing to Z that he has prepared the will according to his instructions,
“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 227
induces Z to sign the will. A has committed forgery.
A writes a letter and signs it with B’s name without B’s authority, certifying that
A is a man of good character and in distressed circumstances from unforeseen misfortune,
intending by means of such letter to obtain alms from Z and other persons. Here, as A
made a false document in order to induce Z to part with property, A has committed
forgery.
A without B’s authority writes a letter and signs it in B’s name certifying to A’s
character, intending thereby to obtain employment under Z. A has committed forgery in
as much as he intended to deceive Z by the forged certificate, and thereby to induce Z to
enter into an express or implied contract for service.
(D). Explanations to the section-
The section provide following explanation for its better understanding,-
Explanation 1: A man’s signature of his own name may amount to forgery.
Illustrations:
A signs his own name to a bill of exchange, intending that it may be believed that
the bill was drawn by another person of the same name. A has committed forgery.
A writes the word “accepted” on a piece of paper and signs it with Z’s name, in
order that B may afterwards write on the paper a bill of exchange drawn by B upon Z, and
negotiate the bill as though it had been accepted by Z. A is guilty of forgery; and if B,
knowing the fact, draws the bill upon the paper pursuant to A’s intention, B is also guilty
of forgery.
A picks up a bill of exchange payable to the order of a different person of the same
name. A endorses the bill in his own name, intending to cause it to be believed that it was
endorsed by the person to whose order it was payable; here A has committed forgery.
A purchases an estate sold under execution of a decree against B. B, after the
seizure of the estate, in collusion with Z, executes a lease of the estate, to Z at a nominal
rent and for a long period and dates the lease six months prior to the seizure, with intent
to defraud A, and to cause it to be believed that the lease was granted before the seizure.
B, though he executes the lease in his own name, commits forgery by antedating it.
A, a trader, in anticipation of insolvency, lodges effects with B for A’s benefit, and
with intent to defraud his creditors; and in order to give a colour to the transaction, writes
a promissory note binding himself to pay to B a sum for value received, and antedates the
note, intending that it may be believed to have been made before A was on the point of
insolvency. A has committed forgery under the first head of the definition.
Explanation 2: The making of a false document in the name of a fictious person,
intending it to be believed that the document was made by a real person, or in the name
“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 228
of a deceased person, intending it to be believed that the document was made by the person
in his lifetime, may amount to forgery.
Illustration:
A draws a bill of exchange upon a fictious person, and fraudulently accepts the bill
in the name of such fictitious person with intent to negotiate it. A commits forgery.
Explanation 3: For the purposes of this section, the expression “affixing electronic
signature” shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section
III. Forgery (S. 336)-
1. Core Offence: Forgery (Section 336)-
Section 336 of the BNS defines the offense of forgery, which is committed by making a
"false document" or a "false electronic record" with a specific intent.
As per S. 336 whoever makes any false document or false electronic record, (or part
thereof), with intention-
(i) to cause damage/injury, or
(ii) to support a false claim/title, or
(iii) to induce someone to part with property or enter into a contract, or
(iv) to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed
commits forgery
Punishment for committing forgery-
S. 336 lays down graded punishment for different types of forgery as-
(i) whosoever commits forgery, shall be punishable with imprisonment up to 2 years or fine or
both.
(ii) whosoever commits forgery for cheating, shall be punishable with imprisonment up to 7 years
or fine or both.
(iii) whosoever commits forgery for harming reputation of any party, shall be punishable with
imprisonment up to 3 years and fine.
IV. Aggravated forms of forgery-
Ss. 338 and 339 deal with aggravated forms of forgery. These are, the instances where
the offence of forgery is considered more serious and severely punishable due to the nature of the
document forged or the intent behind it.
1. Forgery of record of court or of public register, etc (S. 337)-
Section 337 addresses a serious type of forgery specifically aimed at documents
considered vital for public faith and legal order.
In a simple way, Section 337 makes it a major crime to forge official or legal records.
1 “Affixing electronic signature” with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions means adoption of any
methodology or procedure by a person for the purpose of authenticating an electronic record by means of digital
signature;
“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 229
This includes forging any document or electronic record that pretends to be one of the
following official items:
a. Court Records: Documents or proceedings belonging to or used in a court.
b. Official Identity Documents: Identity documents issued by the Government, such as a
Voter Identity Card or Aadhaar Card.
c. Public Registers: Official registers, such as those recording birth, marriage, or burial,
or any register maintained by a public servant in their official capacity. (Note: A "register"
includes lists, data, or entries maintained in electronic form).
d. Official Certificates and Legal Authority: A certificate or document supposedly made
by a public servant acting officially, or legal documents granting the power to file or defend a
lawsuit (like a power of attorney).
The Punishment: Committing this type of forgery is punishable with imprisonment of
either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and the offender shall also be
liable to fine.
2. Forgery of Valuable Security, Will, etc. (S. 338)-
What is forged: A document that purports to be a valuable security, a Will, or an authority
to adopt a son, or a document purporting to give authority to receive or transfer valuable security
or property, or a receipt for money or property.
Punishment: Imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment up to 10 years, and fine.
3. Having in possession and intending it to be used as genuine (S. 339)-
Having in possession any forged document described in Section 337 (Court Record, etc.) or
Section 338 (Valuable Security, Will, etc.), knowing it to be forged, and intending to use it as
genuine fraudulently or dishonestly.
Punishment: Imprisonment up to 7 years, and fine.
V. Allied offences of forgery-
In addition to the act of making a forged document, the BNS penalizes related actions
concerning forgery:
1. Forged document or electronic record and using it as genuine (S. 340)-
This section essentially establishes two points:
a. Definition: A document or electronic record that is created wholly or partially by forgery is
officially designated as a "forged document or electronic record".
b. The Crime and Punishment: If a person fraudulently or dishonestly uses this document (or
electronic record) as if it were real, knowing or having reason to believe it is fake, that person is
guilty of an offence. He shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such
document or electronic record. It means the law holds the knowing user as equally accountable
as the creator.
2. Making or possessing counterfeit seal, etc., with intent to commit forgery
punishable under section 336 (or 338) (S. 341)-
“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 230
This section addresses several offences related to the instruments of forgery. Section 341
addresses the illegal creation and use of tools specifically designed to produce forged documents,
essentially punishing the preparation for serious forgery.
The section covers four main scenarios:
a. Making Tools for Serious Forgery:
If a person makes or possesses a counterfeit seal, plate, or other instrument, specifically
intending to use it to commit the most serious types of forgery (like forging a Valuable Security
or a Will, punishable under Section 336/338 of the BNS), they face severe punishment, which can
include imprisonment for life or up to seven years imprisonment, along with a fine.
b. Making Tools for General Forgery:
If a person makes or possesses a counterfeit tool intended to commit any other kind of
forgery (not the serious type mentioned above), they can be punished with imprisonment up to
seven years, plus a fine.
c. Simple Possession of Counterfeit Tools:
If a person simply possesses any such seal, plate, or instrument, knowing it to be
counterfeit, they face a penalty of up to three years imprisonment, along with a fine.
d. Using Counterfeit Tools:
If a person fraudulently or dishonestly uses a counterfeit seal, plate, or instrument as if it
were genuine, they are liable for the same punishment that applies to the person who originally
made or counterfeited it.
3. Counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described
in section 336, or possessing counterfeit marked material (S. 342)-
Section 342 is related to counterfeiting a device or mark used to authenticate documents or
electronic records. It makes it a crime to make a fake mark or device with the intent to forge
documents, or to have such a fake mark or device in your possession. The penalty for this offense
is imprisonment of up to seven years and a fine.
4. Fraudulent cancellation, destruction, etc., of will, authority to adopt, or
valuable security (S. 343)-
This section covers individuals who fraudulently or dishonestly, or with intent to cause
damage or injury to the public or to any person, cancel, destroy, or deface, or attempt to cancel,
destroy or deface, or secrete or attempt to secrete any document which is or purports to be a
will, or an authority to adopt a son, or any valuable security, or commits mischief in respect
of such document; the punishment for this offence is severe, mandating imprisonment for life, or
imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and liability
to fine.
5. Falsification of accounts (S. 344)-
This section applies to a clerk, officer, or servant who, wilfully and with intent to
defraud, commits the following acts:
“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 231
i. Destroys, alters, mutilates, or falsifies any book, electronic record, valuable security, or
account belonging to or possessed by the employer.
ii. Makes or abets the making of any false entry in, or omits or alters or abets the omission
or alteration of any material particular from or in, any such record or account.
iii. Punishment: Imprisonment up to seven years, or fine, or both.
VI. Conclusion-
The span of Sections 336 to 344 of the BNS, forming a part of Chapter XVIII, outlines a
comprehensive framework designed to safeguard the authenticity and trustworthiness of
documents and electronic records in legal and commercial spheres.
The primary focus of this legislative block is twofold:
(1) Defining the act of Forgery (Section 336) and
(2) Establishing various allied offences that cover the preparation, facilitation, possession, and
misuse of forged or critical documents. The offences criminalised include:
a. The Act of Forgery (336, 337, 338): The structure clearly links the punishment to the
malicious intent behind the fabrication and the nature of the document forged.
i. General Forgery (336): Punishes making a false document with intent to cause damage,
support a false claim, cause a person to part with property, or commit fraud.
ii. Specific Forgery (337 and 338): Applies enhanced penalties for documents critical to
public order and personal affairs. Section 338, specifically targeting valuable securities,
wills, and authorities to adopt a son, mandates severe punishment, including
imprisonment for life or a term up to ten years, underscoring the high legal value attached
to these instruments. Similarly, Section 337 protects records of Courts, public registers
(including identity documents like Aadhaar), and official certificates from public servants.
b. Using and Possessing Forgeries (339 and 340): The BNS ensures accountability for the
entire chain of crime.
i. Section 340 designates any false document made by forgery as a "forged document or
electronic record" and states that whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses such a
document as genuine shall be punished in the same manner as if they had forged it
themselves.
ii. Section 339 makes the possession of such forged documents (described in 337 or 338),
knowing them to be forged and intending to use them as genuine, a punishable offence,
with penalties commensurate with the class of document held.
c. Preparation, Tools, and Destruction (341, 342, 343): These sections tackle the necessary
means and counter-measures involved in document fraud.
i. Sections 341 and 342 criminalise the creation or possession of counterfeit seals, plates,
or authentication marks intended to facilitate forgery, particularly when aimed at
sensitive documents like valuable securities.
ii. Section 343 acts as a safeguard against the deliberate removal of authentic documents,
punishing the fraudulent cancellation, destruction, or secretion of wills, valuable
“Law Master’s Publication”
‘Forgery and Making of False Documents’
Prof. Santosh D. Bhosale 232
securities, or authorities to adopt a son, with penalties up to imprisonment for life or seven
years.
d. Internal Fraud (344): The scope concludes with the specific offence of Falsification of
Accounts (344), imposing up to seven years imprisonment on clerks, officers, or servants who
wilfully alter, destroy, or make false entries in their employer’s books or electronic records with
intent to defraud.
In conclusion, the range of BNS Sections 336 to 344 establishes a robust and modern legal
defence system for documentation, explicitly addressing the digital nature of records and applying
graded, deterrent punishments to penalise not only the ultimate act of forging important documents
but also the preparatory steps, knowing possession, and misuse that sustain document-related
fraud.
****
References-
1. “The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita”
2. “BNS Chapter 19” https://devgan.in/bns/chapter_18.php
4. Section 340 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Forged Document Or Electronic Record And
sanhita-bns-forged-document-or-electronic-record-and-using-it-as-genuine/
5. “THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023”