📖 Book 6 - Chapter 28
1
“Law Master’s” Publication Introduction to ADR”  
Prof. S.D. Bhosale  
(..1..)  
Introduction  
(Alternative Dispute Resolution)  
QUESTION BANK  
Q. 1. Explain the concept of ADR and its growing importance in dispute resolution.  
Q. 2. Give the meaning of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system. State which  
disputes are suitable to ADR process?  
Q.3. What is Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)? For which disputes it is more  
suitable?  
Short Notes  
1. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Co-operative and Banking matters.  
2. Need of ADRs.  
3. Co-operative matters.  
4. ADR in consumer matters.  
Table of Content  
Introduction ....................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.  
 
2
“Law Master’s” Publication Introduction to ADR”  
Prof. S.D. Bhosale  
“Don’t fight; let us resolve the dispute amicably.”  
I. Introduction:-  
In India, presently, we have almost four crore pending cases before the Supreme  
Court, various High Courts, and a number of District and Subordinate Courts. Indian  
judiciary is overburdened. Moreover, it takes a lot of time and cost in deciding cases  
before a Court. The maxims “delay defeats justice” and “justice delayed is justice  
denied” suggest that delay in disposal of cases defeats justice. Delay in deciding cases  
is the biggest drawback of the administration of justice in India as well as worldwide.  
Delay, expensive, overburdened and rigidness are main drawbacks of a conventional  
judicial system worldwide. It makes justice unavailable to all, specifically to poor  
persons.  
Therefore, a dire need was felt to provide cheap, simple, quick and accessible  
justice to all. To achieve these objects, some alternatives to conventional judicial  
system were found out. These alternatives to the conventional judicial system are  
popularly known as “Alternative Dispute Resolution” or “ADR” in short. It includes  
 
3
“Law Master’s” Publication Introduction to ADR”  
Prof. S.D. Bhosale  
arbitration, conciliation, mediation, Lok-Adalat, negotiation etc.  
II. History of alternative dispute resolution in India:-  
The first law on alternate dispute resolution in India was the Indian Arbitration  
Act, 1940. The Act was dealing with the domestic arbitration i.e. arbitration between  
the parties within India. The second law in India on the point of international  
arbitration was the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 and the Foreign  
Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961.  
The abovementioned Acts in flux of time were found unable to achieve its  
objectives. Therefore, the Indian government brought Arbitration and Conciliation  
Ordinance, in 1996. The ordinance was enacted into law in August 1996. The Act is  
very important step towards settlement of dispute amicably. The Act, provides for  
settlement of dispute outside the court through the means of arbitration, conciliation,  
mediation, etc.  
The Law Commission of India in its 129th report in 1988, had advocated the need  
for amicable settlement of disputes between the parties. Moreover, the Malimath  
Committee in 1989, had recommended to make it mandatory for the courts to refer  
disputes pending before them, to resolve through alternate means after framing of  
issues. The committee suggested that the alternate dispute resolution is viable  
alternative to conventional court litigations.  
After taking into consideration various reports of committees, S. 89 of the Civil  
Procedure Code, 1908 was amended in the year, 1999 and was given effect from  
01/07/2002. S. 89 provides for settlement of dispute outside the Court through,  
arbitration, conciliation, judicial settlement, mediation etc. Moreover, Order X rules  
1-A to 1-C also deal with the powers of a court to refer the matter for settlement.  
The Constitution of India also directs that the justice should be made available to  
poor and needy.  
III. Need for the Alternative Dispute Resolution:-  
The ADR1 has following advances over conventional judicial system. These are  
the needs of present days to have ADR.  
1. Less time consuming:-  
Parties to the dispute resolve their disputes in short period of time compared to  
courts.  
2. Cost effective:-  
ADR saves lot of money of the disputing parties.  
1 Alternative dispute resolution for short is called as “ADR".  
         
4
“Law Master’s” Publication Introduction to ADR”  
Prof. S.D. Bhosale  
3. Free from technicalities:-  
ADR is free from technicalities of courts, because informal ways are applied to  
arrive at amiable settlement.  
4. People can freely express themselves:-  
The disputing parties are free from fear of Court, therefore, they can freely  
express themselves. They can reveal the true facts without disclosing it to any court.  
5. Effective way of dispute resolution:-  
There is always a chance of restoring relations of the partiers back. It is because,  
the parties discuss their issues together. It prevents further conflict between the parties  
and helps in maintaining a good relationship between them.  
6. Preserve interest of parties:-  
It preserves the best interest of the parties.  
IV. Various Modes of alternate dispute resolution:-  
The settlement of disputes outside the court can be made through-  
(a) Arbitration:-  
Arbitration is a procedure in which a dispute is submitted by agreement of the  
parties to one or more arbitrators who make a binding decision on the dispute.  
It is a form of alternate dispute resolution. It is a way to resolve dispute outside  
the court. The dispute is decided by one or more persons known as ‘arbitrator’,  
arbitratorsor arbitral tribunal. The Arbitrator renders the arbitration award’ (i.e.  
judgment) which is legally binding on both sides to the dispute and is enforceable in the  
court.  
(b) Conciliation:-  
Conciliationis an impartial process whereby the parties to the dispute use a  
conciliator, who meets with the parties both separately and together in an attempt to  
resolve their differences. Thus the conciliator acts to bring parties to the dispute at  
amicable settlement among themselves.  
It is a non-binding process. The conciliator cannot pass an award to bind both  
parties. Neither is it enforceable in Court.  
(c) Mediation:-  
Mediation is the procedure in which parties discuss their disputes with the  
assistance of a trained impartial third person or persons, who assist them in reaching a  
settlement.  
(d) Negotiation:-  
Negotiationis a process in which decisions and deliberations take place  
between the parties or representatives of the parties specifically without intervention of  
                 
5
“Law Master’s” Publication Introduction to ADR”  
Prof. S.D. Bhosale  
a third party. The representatives to the negotiation are called ‘negotiators’.  
(e) Lok-Adalat:-  
The ‘Lok-Adalat’ means ‘people’s Court’. Through it, the disputes pending  
before the court or even the future dispute (which has not yet reached at court) are  
settled through negotiation, conciliation, etc., with the assistance of specifically trained  
and experienced conciliators. This is called as a judicial settlement.  
These topics are discussed in detail at appropriate places in the notes.  
V. Role of Alternative dispute resolution in different matters (Discussed at  
appropriate place in coming topics):-  
*****  
   
Purchased by: Guest