3
“Law Master’s” Publication “Introduction to ADR”
Prof. S.D. Bhosale
arbitration, conciliation, mediation, Lok-Adalat, negotiation etc.
II. History of alternative dispute resolution in India:-
The first law on alternate dispute resolution in India was the Indian Arbitration
Act, 1940. The Act was dealing with the domestic arbitration i.e. arbitration between
the parties within India. The second law in India on the point of international
arbitration was the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 and the Foreign
Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961.
The abovementioned Acts in flux of time were found unable to achieve its
objectives. Therefore, the Indian government brought Arbitration and Conciliation
Ordinance, in 1996. The ordinance was enacted into law in August 1996. The Act is
very important step towards settlement of dispute amicably. The Act, provides for
settlement of dispute outside the court through the means of arbitration, conciliation,
mediation, etc.
The Law Commission of India in its 129th report in 1988, had advocated the need
for amicable settlement of disputes between the parties. Moreover, the Malimath
Committee in 1989, had recommended to make it mandatory for the courts to refer
disputes pending before them, to resolve through alternate means after framing of
issues. The committee suggested that the alternate dispute resolution is viable
alternative to conventional court litigations.
After taking into consideration various reports of committees, S. 89 of the Civil
Procedure Code, 1908 was amended in the year, 1999 and was given effect from
01/07/2002. S. 89 provides for settlement of dispute outside the Court through,
arbitration, conciliation, judicial settlement, mediation etc. Moreover, Order X rules
1-A to 1-C also deal with the powers of a court to refer the matter for settlement.
The Constitution of India also directs that the justice should be made available to
poor and needy.
III. Need for the Alternative Dispute Resolution:-
The ADR1 has following advances over conventional judicial system. These are
the needs of present days to have ADR.
1. Less time consuming:-
Parties to the dispute resolve their disputes in short period of time compared to
courts.
2. Cost effective:-
ADR saves lot of money of the disputing parties.
1 Alternative dispute resolution for short is called as “ADR".