âLaw Masterâsâ Publication
âLaw Reformsâ
Prof. .S. D. Bhosale
140
(..20..)
LAW REFORMS
QUESTION BANK
1. Discuss the steps taken by the law commission on Civil Procedure amendments.
2. Law Commission on Civil Procedure amendment: Law Reform: Civil Procedure.
3. Discuss recent amendments in the Civil Procedure Code, especially amendments of
1999 and 2002.
SHORT NOTES
1. Amendment of 2002 in C. P.C
2. Amendment of 1999 in C.P.C.
I. NEED FOR LAW REFORM-
The value of society changes from time to time and from place to place. To cope
with the changing society, laws should also change. Static laws either restrict the growth
of society or society does not obey them.
Thus, to survive and be useful in society, the law should change according to the
needs of changing society. Therefore, law reforms become necessary. Substantial and
procedural laws need to be amended occasionally according to their need.
II. AMENDMENTS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE-
In ancient India, Hindu customs and Dharma shastras were prevalent in the legal
and judicial system. However, after the Muslim invasion, the Islamic legal system was
followed in most parts of India till the 17th Century. Thereafter, East India Company
concurred with India and introduced the English legal and judicial system.
The British adopted the method of enactment of laws and amendments therein to
reform the laws. They also adopted the practice of appointing Commissions to find
âLaw Masterâsâ Publication
âLaw Reformsâ
Prof. .S. D. Bhosale
141
loopholes in laws and suggest remedies. A number of amendments affected those remedies.
A number of reforms (amendments) have been carried on in the Civil Procedure
2002.
Reforms of the Code are affected by these amendments. Many innovative reforms have
been carried on to make the Code more practicable.
The reforms have been suggested by a number of law commissions, keeping in view
the following objects- viz-
1) To provide a fair trial.
2) To expedite the disposal of civil suits.
3) To simplify the procedure.
IMPORTANT REFORMS BY AMENDING ACTS 1999 AND 2002-
Amendment Act 1999 and 2002 have effected the following reforms-
1) In every plaint, facts shall be proved by affidavit (S. 26).
The amendment is made to reduce the possibility of false statements being made in
the plaint.
2) Summons to the defendant is to be issued within 30 days from the date of the
institution of the suit
(S. 27).
The amendment is carried out to lay down a fixed time frame to issue summons and
to avoid delay in sending summons.
3) The penalty of fine is increased from Rs. 500 to Rs. 5000/- to the person who makes
defaults in an appearance before the court in spite of service of summons. The
amendment is carried to increase fines due to a decrease in the value of money.
4) Court passing decree can not execute decree outside the local limits of its
jurisdiction.
5) No judgment debtor can be detained in civil prison in execution of the money decree
if the decreed amount does not exceed Rs. 2000. The amendment is carried out to
extend the pecuniary limit for the detention of judgment debtor. The pecuniary limit
is incurred to cope- up with a reduction in money value.
6) Alienation of property after attachment is void (S. 64). The object of the amendment
1
Prior to 1859, there was no uniform Code of Civil Procedure for the whole of India. Different procedures were
applied in civil proceedings in different parts of the country. The first uniform Civil Procedure Code was enacted in
the year 1859. The code was amended time to time according to the needs in 1877, 1882.
The present Civil Procedure Code was enacted in 1908 by major amendment. However, it was further
amended in 1951, 1956 and 1976.
The Code (henceforth for the purpose of brevity the Civil Procedure Code is called as âthe Codeâ) was further
amended in 1999 and 2002 for speedy disposal of civil cases on recommendation of Justice Malimath Committee.
âLaw Masterâsâ Publication
âLaw Reformsâ
Prof. .S. D. Bhosale
142
is to protect the attachment order.
7) Where it appears to the Court that there exists the element of settlement between the
parties, the court shall formulate the terms of settlement and give them to the parties
for their observation, and after receiving observations, the court shall reformulate
the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for-
(a) arbitration.
(b) Conciliation.
(c) The judicial settlement, including settlement through Lok-Adalat, or
(d) Mediation. (S. 89).
Thus the amendment is carried with the object of settling the dispute
amicably outside the court. The amendment is made as per the
recommendation of the Law Commission of India and the Mallimath
Committee. This amendment is innovative.
8) Compensation for obtaining arrest, attachment or injunction on insufficient grounds
has been enhanced from rupees one thousand to fifty thousand.
The object of the amendment is to cope with decreasing value of money and
to compensate the defendant for scruples the plaintiff (S. 95).
9) No appeal shall lie, except on a question of law, from a decree in any suit of the
nature cognizable by Courts of small cause when the amount or value of the subject
matter of the original suit does not exceed ten thousand rupees (earlier it was three
thousand rupees) (S. 96).
10) The provision as to Letters patent appeal has been abolished (S. 100 A). The object
of the amendment is to restrict appeals to be laid before the Division Bench of the
same High Court (Letters Patent) if it is once heard and decided by a single Judgeâs
Bench of the same High Court.
11) No appeal shall lie from any decree when the subject matter of the original suit is
for recovery of money not exceeding twenty-five thousand rupees (S. 102). The
amendment has abolished the second appeal in all cases where the value of the
subject matter in the suit does not exceed Rs. 25000.
12) Where any period is fixed or granted by the court for doing of any act prescribed
or allowed by this Code, the court may in its discretion, from time to time, enlarge
such period. However, such a period should not exceed 30 days in total.
Thus, the amendment lays down the limit of 30 days to avoid delay in
carrying on its orders.
13) While the institution of the suit, the plaint shall be presented in duplicate. Earlier,
there was no provision for presenting a plaint in duplicate (O. 4 R. 1).
âLaw Masterâsâ Publication
âLaw Reformsâ
Prof. .S. D. Bhosale
143
14) The defendant should file a written statement within 30 days from the service of
summons upon him of the suit. Written Statements may be allowed later. However,
the period of filing a written statement should not exceed 90 days from service of
summons upon the defendant (O. 5, R. 1). The amendment is carried to avoid delay
in filing written statements.
15) Summons to the defendant shall be accompanied by a copy of the plaint (O. 5, R.
2).
16) Now delivery of summons can be made through courier, fax message, or electronic
mail service (O. 5, R. 9).
17) Pleading should be supported by an affidavit (O. 5, R. 15).
18) Amendment in pleading is to be carried on within 14 days from the date of order
(if not ordered to be carried earlier than 14 days) (O. 6, R. 17 and 18).
19) All documents in support of the suit are to be filed by the plaintiff at the time of
filing the plaint itself (O. 7, R. 14) and by the defendant at the time of filing the
written statement. No documents are allowed subsequently to be filed except with
the permission of the court (O. 8, R. 1-A).
20) The court can direct the parties to opt for any one mode of alternative dispute
resolution (O. 10, R. 1-A).
21) Where the pleader or party refuses or is unable to answer any material question
relating to the suit, the court may adjourn the matter to the next date not exceeding
seven days (O. 10, R. 4). The amendment is carried with the object of expediting
the matter.
22) Application to seek to leave to deliver interrogatories is to be decided within 7 days.
(O. 11, R. 2). There was no limit of 7 days earlier.
23) âOriginal documentary evidence is to be submitted before the settlement of issues.
(O. 8, R. 1). There was no such provision of filing original at the time or before
framing issues.
24) Adjournments for framing issues may be granted, but the period shall not be
extended for more than seven days.
25) No adjournment shall be granted more than three times to a party during the hearing
of the suit. (O. 17, R. 1). The object is to dispose of matter speedily.
26) When the hearing of the suit has commenced, it shall be continued day to day (O.
17, R. 2). The object is to dispose of matters speedily.
27) Written arguments shall form part of the record (O. 18, R. 1).
28) Evidence is allowed to be recorded by affidavit (O. 18, R. 4). Earlier, recording
evidence was very time-consuming, even for chiefef- examination before the court.
âLaw Masterâsâ Publication
âLaw Reformsâ
Prof. .S. D. Bhosale
144
29) Evidence can be recorded on commission, even though the witness resides within
the local jurisdiction of The Court (O. 26, R. 4 A).
30) Every memorandum of appeal shall be accompanied by a copy of a judgment (O.
41, R. 1).
*****